To: JustSayNoToNannies
Was it liberals who "surrendered" in the War On Alcohol aka Prohibition?
Lame. But pro-dopes always drag the prohibition argument into the mix.
Here. Let me help you out. You need to mention that unless we surrender in the WOD, Nazi SWAT teams will no-knock my house and shoot my dog.
~snort~
Look. All you really need to know about the subject of legalizing dope is who is FOR it.
So. Why not just admit these two fine gentlemen are correct and the rest of the world is stupid?
101 posted on
12/14/2011 10:25:52 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Was it liberals who "surrendered" in the War On Alcohol aka Prohibition?Lame. But pro-dopes always drag the prohibition argument into the mix.
And big-government Drug Warriors always evade the obvious point: laws against the lethal, addictive drug alcohol did more harm than good, so why should we think the opposite is or could be true about other drugs?
To: Responsibility2nd
All you really need to know about the subject of legalizing dope is who is FOR it. Anytime somebody tells you "All you need to know is..", you can bet there's more to it than what they're telling you and they don't want you to know what it is.
To: Responsibility2nd
All you really need to know about the subject of legalizing dope is who is FOR it.All you really need to know about the subject of legalizing dope is who is AGAINST it--the federal government and mexican drug cartels, for starters.
It is clear which side you have chosen.
141 posted on
12/15/2011 9:35:39 AM PST by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than politicians, professors and preachers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson