Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

It depends on what “great” is. FDR’s domestic policies were not great. His leadership skills in wartime were.


7 posted on 12/13/2011 8:04:18 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Genoa
It depends on what “great” is. FDR’s domestic policies were not great. His leadership skills in wartime were.

Exactly. Considering that FDR ushured us through the greatest economic crises in US history (the Great Depression)(even though badly...), AND the greatest war in world history (WWII), AND that he was in power for over 12 years.... one can call him the "greatest" (certainly the most influential) president of the 20th Century.

Of course in the "influential" sense, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were "great" too.

Besides all that, FDR's biggest wartime leadership skill--was his military ignorance--and leaving the war up to the generals.

Blessedly, Marshall, MacArthur, Eisenhower, et al., were real pros.

24 posted on 12/13/2011 8:15:17 AM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Genoa

Great means something different to a historian than everyone else.

Think of historical figures who have “the Great” appended to their names. They weren’t all rainbows and skittles, some of them were tyrants. “Great” in this definition means powerful, effective, not necessarily someone you agree with.

Do I know that’s what Newt meant? Not at all, but it’s possible.

BTW, Reagan praised FDR too, and he turned out OK.


27 posted on 12/13/2011 8:17:20 AM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson