To: PapaBear3625
This would actually be a good thing. Weve been getting too used to fighting against technologically-inferior opponents, and getting dependent upon weapons systems that rely upon nobody being in a position to jam signal reception:How is this possibly a good thing, sure you wrote that right or maybe I am missing your point?
31 posted on
12/12/2011 8:08:01 AM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: Las Vegas Ron
It's a good thing to know in advance so you don't send your best assets in to be slaughtered because you underestimated your opponent. They tipped their hand too early. We've been exceptionally bold on the assumption that we were dealing with technically inferior opponents. This incident exposes that we have a more substantial opponent. Forewarned is forearmed.
35 posted on
12/12/2011 8:34:01 AM PST by
Myrddin
To: Las Vegas Ron
How is this possibly a good thing, sure you wrote that right or maybe I am missing your point? I'd rather find out our deficiencies in a minor incident against Iran, rather than finding out how vulnerable we are in a major conflict against China.
41 posted on
12/12/2011 11:44:29 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson