Posted on 12/09/2011 1:31:59 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Perhaps you could draw the distintion between liberal women and conservative women. That way you wouldn’t come off as a jerk.
You get it, Lakeshark, you get it.
“Newt, you magnificent bastard!”
Great ending. ;>)
Ad hominem attacks....admission you have no argument.
If it weren’t for women there never would have been a President Clinton nor a President Obama. Period.
I hope you are right. We really don’t have a great deal of choice. Newt is better than Romney because we know he can be molded and shaped by favorable opinion.
All I know this go round is that I cannot sit back and let Obama finish off the US. It my happen anyway. Look at how the left has invaded every nook and cranny of our lives. It frightens me. Indoctrination frightens me.
There isn’t much left to lose. I wish we could have done better this time, but we may have to take the best we can get and pray it works out.
A few articles comparing Newt to Churchill:
http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=181725
http://bobmccarty.com/2011/12/07/newt-gingrich-americas-21st-century-churchill/
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/284220/mcquaid-gingrich-resembles-churchill-brian-bolduc
Article from May 2011 about Newt’s chances of winning:
Indeed. It depends on who they are talking to on that particular day or occasion.
The surface reason Newt was pushed out of the speaker’s position was his affair.
The underlying (actual) reason is that, as speaker, he used his position to push the GOP house to the right. Insisting that they actually stay true to the promises they made in the Contract with America. That generated a lot of bad-will from more “seasoned” Republicans that were more worried about retaining their seats than getting things done.
You see the same dynamic with the “Tea Party” freshmen in the house. They were the target of a lot of wrath from other GOP congressmen, because they insisted on holding firm on their promises, instead of “being practical” and compromising their principles.
Newt is not for ObamaCare. He is committed to repeal it and repeal, abolish, rescind everything Obama.
Not all women. Unmarried women.
Why are they unmarried? Because they are young (Dem base), minority (Dem base) or radical feminist (Dem base).
It’s not because of their gender, it’s the demographic.
The record of actual accomplishments says it, not me. It’s not necessarily right or wrong, it just is.
I’ll take Newt’s record of actual accomplishments any day of the week over Mitt’s. They’re polar opposites.
Your chameleon is Romney. Newt has been a Reagan conservative all along. Doesn’t have to pretend to be pro-life or pretend to appreciate Reagan. Newt was there. Romney was in the land of denial
You can divide males demographically also. Unless you believe somehow there are no young and minority and radical males.
Back to my original argument that you took objective to. Newt will not win a majority of the female vote, not because of his background but simply because he is Republican. He could be the pillar of virtue and he wouldn’t win a majority of women. Reagan was the last Republican male to win a majority of female voters...barely.
Married women vote liberal much more than married men. Unmarried women vote liberal much more than unmarried men. Men consistently vote in greater percentages for conservative candidates and women vote in greater percentages for liberal candidates.
And as would be expected, I am dealing with facts and you are dealing with emotion, which is the root of the problem.
It is not demographics, it is simply that a majority of women are unthinking idiots politically. (look up majority by the way...it does not mean all...unless you get all emotional about it)
I agree to a point.
Never have thought he was a good choice.
I could vote for him under some circumstances.
What good choice do we have?
Just curious can you cite anything Bachmann has actually done, not just talked about but accomplished?
Just curious can you cite anything Bachmann has actually done, not just talked about but accomplished?
I think everyone should watch this interview w Kudlow outstanding stuff:
http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlows-money-politics/285135/one-one-newt-gingrich
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.