Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
"Should Obama and company have been drawn into this? I believe so. Is it unfair to take down Blago for what he was trying to do? I don't think so, and when a jury buys into what the prosecutors is saying these days, it's a fairly reasoned thing to think there was good reason. Look at the cases these days that wind up exhonerating the guilty, because the jury acts in an almost unbelievable manner."

You got the cart in front of the horse. The bad verdicts (OJ, Casey Anthony, etc.) are the direct result of jury nullification. Blago's defense didn't dare attempt jury nullification, as to do so would have directly involved the President of the United States. No lawyer since John Dean has gone there...

73 posted on 12/08/2011 9:06:41 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: StAnDeliver

I believe Blago’s team did try to involve members of the administration. The judge refused to allow it.

That being said, I believe the prosecutor has grounds to file charges against administration officials, but having seen how Clinton scandals turned out, probably figured it was a lost cause here.


77 posted on 12/08/2011 11:14:41 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Romney, Newt, any chance whatsoever you might sometime pander to U.S. Citizens vs the illegals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson