Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan
In addition I would say that I’ve never been for embryonic stem cell research per se. I have been for, there are a lot of different ways to get embryonic stem cells. I think if you can get embryonic stem cells for example from placental blood if you can get it in ways that do not involve the loss of a life that’s a perfectly legitimate avenue of approach.

Italicized above are Gingrich's actual words. Note the underlined section. That is what Gingrich thinks. Now, someone can say he is wrong about placental blood being a source of embryonic stem cells, but they can't deny that he thinks they are, and that he opposes loss of life.

195 posted on 12/06/2011 5:43:00 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

There are a lot of people who think stem cells from cord blood, placenta, etc, are “embryonic,” though they are adult stem cells. And I do think that Newt is opposed to the taking of innocent lives, at whatever stage of development, for someone else’s medical benefit.


203 posted on 12/06/2011 8:06:40 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson