Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here is the statement by Gingrich in its entirety:

Gingrich Reaffirms His Belief in the Sanctity of all Human Life, Born and Unborn

Atlanta, GA - (12/3) – In advance of this evenings forum hosted by Mike Huckabee, Newt 2012 released the following statement today from Newt Gingrich regarding his belief in the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn.

“As I have stated many times throughout the course of my public life, I believe that human life begins at conception. I believe that every unborn life is precious, no matter how conceived. I also believe that we should work for the day when there will be no abortions for any reason, and that every unborn child will be welcomed into life and protected by law.

“That is why I have supported, and will continue to support, pro-life legislation that not only limits, but also reduces, the total number of abortions, with a view to the eventual legal protection of all unborn human life.

“As I have also stated in the past, on day one of my administration, I will sign an executive order reinstating Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City policy that prevents taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortions overseas. I will also work with Congress to repeal Obamacare, defund Planned Parenthood so that no taxpayer dollars are being used to fund abortions but rather transfer the money so it is used to promote adoption and other pro-family policies, and to enact legislation that provides greater protections for the unborn.

“In terms of new pro-life legislation, I stated as recently as November 19 at a public form of candidates in Iowa that I support Congress enacting pro-life legislation under the 14th Amendment, including legislation that would define personhood as beginning at conception.

“As I have also made clear in several of my public pronouncements throughout this campaign, I oppose federal funding of any research that destroys a human embryo because we are also dealing here with human life.

“My convictions on human life are longstanding, deeply felt, and irrevocable matters of conscience. I will do all in my power – always – to foster reverence for life.”

1 posted on 12/04/2011 7:50:20 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Notwithstanding

Gingrich has converted to Roman Catholicism several years ago.


2 posted on 12/04/2011 7:58:52 PM PST by etradervic (Gingrich in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Good enough for me.

I won’t even consider a candidate who can’t stand up and agree with this statement.


3 posted on 12/04/2011 8:00:21 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

>> Newt: “I believe that human life begins at conception.”

Hard to imagine at what point thereafter life is injected.


4 posted on 12/04/2011 8:00:29 PM PST by Gene Eric (Save a pretzel for the gas jets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

I hope he really means this.


5 posted on 12/04/2011 8:02:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Gingrich: Life Doesn't Begin at Conception Because That Would 'Open Up ... Very Difficult Questions'
6 posted on 12/04/2011 8:04:49 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Newt is as big a flip flopper as that other guy.


7 posted on 12/04/2011 8:06:00 PM PST by Taking Congress back in 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Didn’t he just say it didn’t?


8 posted on 12/04/2011 8:06:10 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

WTF?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2816014/posts


14 posted on 12/04/2011 8:22:34 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich: Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

interesting, this. He just said something different in the last few days.


15 posted on 12/04/2011 8:27:55 PM PST by Ingtar (Newt (four more for Obama) & Mitt (Obamacare) - what wonderful choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

He’s trying to steal Romney’s title as a world champion “Cover the Road” politico.


19 posted on 12/04/2011 8:30:36 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Equal protection is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Besides, all this campaign rhetoric doesn’t line up with his actions any how.

He promised the Susan B. Anthony List that, given the chance, he would sign immoral, unconstitutional “fetal pain” legislation. The polar opposite of a personhood, Fourteenth Amendment position.

And he supports pro-abort politicians like Scozzafava, and many others.

Given the choice between believing their words and believing their actions, I will go with the latter every single time.

Gingrich is a big phony. Big news, right?


22 posted on 12/04/2011 8:34:12 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Equal protection is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

O.K. I realize I am wading into some deep water here, but I really want to understand.

Gingrich says he is pro-life. He may have come to his beliefs thru age or religion. What revelence is it to “where life begins?” If one is pro-life, one is pro-life. Unlike our current rESIDENT who believes nobody should be punished with a baby and believes in late term abortion.

He has already said that he thinks embyronic stem cell research can be accomplished in other ways..i.e. umbilical cord.

Many years ago, the Catholic church believed that the mother should be sacrificed for the child. And if both died, so be it.

So if an ectopic pregnancy presents..what is the answer?

And before you answer, consider that the mother may be your wife or mother. And that ectopic child is a human life.


26 posted on 12/04/2011 8:46:16 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Newt’s an intelligent individual. As a Catholic he knew that his previous statement ran counter to Catholic moral teaching. This new statement while correct certainly gives me a moment of deep pause. We don’t need anymore CINO Pelosi’s and Kennedy’s.


36 posted on 12/04/2011 9:03:05 PM PST by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Right to Life -

Asked in an interview on the CBS News program “Face the Nation,” whether he agreed with Republicans who oppose Federal abortion payments in cases of rape or incest or to protect the life of a mother, Mr. Gingrich said: “No. First of all, I think you should have funding in the case of rape or incest or life of the mother, which is the first step.”

http://rightonlife.org/2011/11/24/pro-life-groups-should-say-no-to-newt-and-pooh-pooh-perry-2/

Self Defense -

“In 1996, Newt Gingrich turned his back on guns and voted for the anti-gun Brady Campaign’s Lautenberg Gun Ban, which strips the Second Amendment rights of citizens involved in misdemeanor domestic violence charges or temporary protection orders –- in some cases for actions as minor as spanking a child or grabbing a spouse’s wrist.(1)”

http://www.nationalgunrights.org/the-inconvenient-truth-about-newt/

Newt does not support the right to life or the means to protect it and is nothing more than a flip-flopping RINO, just like Mitt Romney.


45 posted on 12/04/2011 9:26:49 PM PST by RasterMaster ("To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

For this alone, I’d vote for Newt instead of Slick Mitt even though I’m not thrilled with either of them.


50 posted on 12/04/2011 9:36:25 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Why do ANY of you believe this man??? “Snake oil for sale! Snake oil for sale!”


55 posted on 12/04/2011 9:47:47 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Newt balanced four budgets, reformed welfare, orchestrated a GOP takeover of both houses of Congress, and has a 99% pro-life voting record.

He is a scholar who understands history, details of governmental affairs, current events and global politics. They won’t be able dismiss him with the standard “Republicans are stupid” attack.

His breadth of knowledge and brilliant analytical skills will shine during the presidential debates. He will educate the public while crushing Obama. He has the experience needed for the dismantling of the federal bureaucracy.


61 posted on 12/04/2011 10:00:03 PM PST by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
A very quick and very superficial flip-flop.

Newt is not for legal protection from conception forward.

66 posted on 12/04/2011 10:17:57 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

BTTT


72 posted on 12/04/2011 11:08:26 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Okay, fine.

Now tell us how you plan on eliminating the welfare/entitlement problem.
73 posted on 12/04/2011 11:12:07 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson