To: Notwithstanding
Didn’t he just say it didn’t?
8 posted on
12/04/2011 8:06:10 PM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: freekitty
9 posted on
12/04/2011 8:10:14 PM PST by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: freekitty
Apparently he mis-spoke.
The reason he issued this statement is to correct himself.
12 posted on
12/04/2011 8:13:22 PM PST by
Notwithstanding
(1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
To: freekitty
No, but there are posters at Freerepublic who want to believe there is a duplicity here when there is not. They have an agenda that really has nothing to do with the sanctity of the unborn little ones.
27 posted on
12/04/2011 8:46:54 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: freekitty
“Didn’t he just say it didn’t?”
No, he was speaking of the political reality today. In that sense it does open a big can of worms...
191 posted on
12/05/2011 10:05:56 PM PST by
babygene
(Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson