Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

Why is an endorsement of Specter, 7 years ago at the behest of party and president, ‘unpardonable,’ but Newt’s endoresement of Scozzafava only 2 years ago is just peachy?


170 posted on 12/05/2011 9:53:24 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack
Behest or not, Sphincter was someone with a proven track record of opposing ALL conservative ideas. Scozzafava was an unproven commodity---probably lib---running against a guy who had issues of his own.

Worse, Sphincter was a SENATOR and only one of 100, with a six-year stay in office. I think in terms of impact it's a big difference. But the question was why people are not excited about Santorum and I gave you some answers.

The other BIG reason that people are more excited about Newt than Santorum is that every single time Newt has been given a platform he has attacked OBAMA, while others (including Santorum) bobbed and weaved (think of the answer on the "gay" soldier). If Santorum had kept half as much attention on Obama as Newt has, he'd be in the top tier.

176 posted on 12/05/2011 3:10:35 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson