[CitizenUSA]

Strategerist makes a valid point. The UCMJ does indeed make heterosexual oral sex illegal for service members. As a minimum, oral sex between husband and wife shouldn't be criminal.

On the other hand, we all know the senators did this in order to approve of homosexual acts, too. They could have removed just the sodomy provision for heterosexuals, but they went further for a reason. This is all part of the DADT repeal deal. They want to make the perverse acceptable if not normal.

We also know where this ultimately leads. Have a spiritual, natural law, or medical/scientific reason for opposing homosexual sex? Better think twice before you express that opinion, because our political betters think homosexuality is a civil rights issue. That, of course, legitimizes using the full weight of federal power to force people to accept and approve of homosexuality, just like they did to stop racial discrimination.

[little jeremiah]

His point is not valid, because the entire repeal is to advance the homosexual agenda and I guess the bestiality agenda (?), and if they wanted to de-criminalize opposite sex sodomy they could have tried to do that any time they wanted to.

We also know where this ultimately leads. Have a spiritual, natural law, or medical/scientific reason for opposing homosexual sex? Better think twice before you express that opinion, because our political betters think homosexuality is a civil rights issue.

Not speaking up is why we are in the abyss right now. We better start speaking up soon, and loudly.