I am well aware of when the piece was written. I have read all 25 pages.
Pro-amnesty Newt said, "Anything less than requiring people who are working here illegally to return home to apply for a worker visa is amnesty."
He did not say we should allow a "small percentage of illegals who pay taxes, receive no entitlements, can pay for health care, have no criminal record". He said, "Anything less than requiring people who are working here illegally to return home to apply for a worker visa is amnesty."
Not only is he a flip-flopper, he is a pro-amnesty flip-flopper.
And your attempt at defending his flip-flopping was, frankly, pathetic. But thank you for playing.
Its pretty obvious you are lying. If you had read it, you would know that the statement was in referrence to a proposed revised worker visa program, along with "smart cards," and other provisions. These were the "visas" he was referring to, and they currently don't exist.
No need to thank me for "playing." The game here seems to be that people like you invent lies about candidates who are not named Herman Cain, and people like me clear them up. What happens is that others read these threads, and they get to learn things they didn't know about candidates.
San Diego...I get it now.
It seems that anything short of sending them all back is amnesty to you. I'll expect a significant and successful effort from Newt to close the border before any "amnesty" is put in the works.
At the front lines would you accept a highly secure border by 2014 followed by a practical plan to deal with the 20 million illegals if could be made to happen??