Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein
YAWN, too. What do I care? Newt’s had 3 wives, Clinton was a rapist and John Edwards a lying, cheating hounddog. Mr. Cain is a paragon compared to these guys. And I don’t even believe the charges!

What do you care??? When we said it speaks to his character when it was Clinton we were right. He used the Presidency to line his pockets by selling our national secrets to China. Then he topped it all off with 3,000 people paying for Clinton's legacy on 9/11. That's why you should care.

153 posted on 11/28/2011 3:10:01 PM PST by txroadkill (FreeRepublic.com- "A Wretched Hive of Scum and Villany" - Zotted Romney Troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: txroadkill

Good reminder on why character matters.


161 posted on 11/28/2011 3:13:05 PM PST by CajunConservative ( Leadership. It is defined by action, not position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: txroadkill

First of all, I don’t believe the charges. Why are you going on about Clinton selling us out to China? Does that have anything to do with Cain?

Why don’t you worry about the Perry rumors surrounding Geoff Connors? Two can play at this game.


176 posted on 11/28/2011 3:21:52 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Let's have a Cain Mutiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: txroadkill

RoadKill...

Here’s what I don’t get, yet:

What is it that makes people overlook big-time potential character issues? And those same people will accrue more weight to a poorly worded comment in a debate?

Why is it that people will go into intellectual contortions to defend their “chosen” person...even to the point of admitting that morals and ethics don’t matter to them? People that will denigrate another candidate because he’s not “conservative” enough??!

CONSERVATIVE!! But their own candidate’s flaws or “red flags” are not just defended; they’re accepted and embraced.

Comparisons to Clinton and Kennedy are rife. “They did it. Why can’t we?” seems to be the justification.

This is ridiculous, base, amoral and indefensible.

Out.


292 posted on 11/28/2011 4:39:14 PM PST by Chasaway ( Tonto: "What do you mean "WE", white man?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson