RoadKill...
Here’s what I don’t get, yet:
What is it that makes people overlook big-time potential character issues? And those same people will accrue more weight to a poorly worded comment in a debate?
Why is it that people will go into intellectual contortions to defend their “chosen” person...even to the point of admitting that morals and ethics don’t matter to them? People that will denigrate another candidate because he’s not “conservative” enough??!
CONSERVATIVE!! But their own candidate’s flaws or “red flags” are not just defended; they’re accepted and embraced.
Comparisons to Clinton and Kennedy are rife. “They did it. Why can’t we?” seems to be the justification.
This is ridiculous, base, amoral and indefensible.
Out.
Cain has only been accused.
I can accuse you of anything that I choose.
In addition, all I need is your cell and I can text you hundreds of times.
Does that even mean that you read them?
I get text messages and email spam by the hundreds. Does that mean I am involved with any of these people?
So people with any sense of decency and fairness, and let the shoe fit whom it may, will wait until they see the contents of the text messages and whether they were replied to and if so how.
An whether there were in fact any flight and hotel reservations and if so who rode in the seats and who stayed in the hotel.
Until you see these, speculation is childish blubbering.
And for the sanctimonious Perrybots, if Perry had more than single digits he would soon be confronted with some half naked porn star claiming he banged her.
The only reason he has not had the treatment is that he did not stay at the top long enough to be a factor.
Frankly, I would take him over either Newt or Romney, but that may never be a choice.