Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Good for ruff tuff guy Perry but a real ruff tuff guy is ruff and tuff on America as a soverign nation. Leaky borders and instate tuition for illegals are utter BS. I’ll still gladly vote for Rick Perry but he should stop being so gay when it comes to Mexico. And in advance I will tell anyone, I can give a flip about the “rich” Tex-Mex heritage of Texas. Just commit to building a fence in a way that sounds believable. So far RP has not done this


12 posted on 11/20/2011 9:42:53 AM PST by dennisw (I heard the old man laughing What good is a used up world and how could it be worth having-Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dennisw

You must have the hispanic vote to win. It is a smart tactic in how Perry is handling this. Newt is for amnesty Perry is NOT. Cain wants fo fry illegals which has enraged all legal Hispanics. You just might want to read the ‘Art of War’ before making such statements.


15 posted on 11/20/2011 10:05:05 AM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
"I will tell anyone, I can give a flip about the “rich” Tex-Mex heritage of Texas. Just commit to building a fence in a way that sounds believable. So far RP has not done this.

Governor Perry has described in detail what he wants to do on the border. He as promised to seal the border within a year if he is President. You should know that there is not enough money for Texas to do it alone. This is a federal responsibility. We should thank the people of Texas for being willing to finance what they have done.

The job of running a fence is a complicated matter. I give a quick look at the Rio Grande River portion of the fence problem. The river makes up 1,254 miles of the nearly 2,000-mile border. So, let's put on our pragmatic thinking caps and look at the problem of fencing the Rio Grande:

You talk about America as a sovereign nation. What about the land rights of your fellow citizen? Do you want a fence to take out their access to property that goes out to the middle of the Rio Grande? How are you going to build a fence out in the middle of the Rio Grande? Are you going to sit back and watch people lose hundreds of acres of land that their families have owned for generations be cut off with a fence? And, will the rich land owners let the fence cut through their property.

If people are so intent on a fence, why not start a citizen's fence building fund. Included in that cost, will be proper compensation for the loss of land (and the future loss of income). Included will be the cost of fencing along the Rio Grande which would destroy all kinds of economic activities along the river. For instance, gourmet river trips in Big Bend National Park:

Instead, you want this?

Just to prevent this?

When they have run tunnels under the Rio Grande like this one:

Do you think Governor Rick Perry could have built a fence with all of the complicated issues involving just the Rio Grande River?

Put on your pragmatic thinking cap.

46 posted on 11/20/2011 4:42:48 PM PST by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson