Precisely!
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Anyone who has ever taken 8th grade biology already knew this. That “nonviable tissue mass” crap is something the people hating/abortion loving commie ‘RATS came up with.
You don’t have to be a scientist to know that life begins at the moment of conception.
Liberalism is a disease.
btw...thanks for posting this! :-)
NEVER A DOUBT!
BOOKMARK.
Praise God!
From a scientific point of view, there never has been a question of whether the embryo is alive and human from the moment of conception.
That is precisely why so many artificial definitions of “human” have been invented. The only thing these definitions have in common is that whatever marker is put forth as being the definitive measure of what is “human” always, conveniently, develops after the point at which abortions are no longer performed (by the abortionist promoting that specific definition, anyway).
There is never a moment, not one second, that a human zygote, embryo, fetus, etc. etc., is not human.
There is never a moment, not one second, that a human zygote, embryo, fetus, etc., etc. is not alive.
Thus, from the moment of conception, a human being is deserving of all of the rights and privileges of every other human being living under the protection of our Constitution.
Abortion is evil. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Abortion is the handmaiden of the Devil himself.
Every human being that is aborted is celebrated by Beelzebub with glee.
And woe unto our nation that has allowed more babies to be aborted - legally - than were slaughtered in all of the wars we were involved in, all of the victims of the Holocaust...
I weep for what we have done.
“Enlightened discourse between opposing parties must assume good motives by all involved, and then go about asking the essential questions...”
Only someone intellectually dishonest would assume or even care about “good motives”. Would the author suggest that “enlightened discourse” would require us to assume “good motives” or care about motives on the part of Nazis in a discussion of whether Jews are “fully human”.
The proabortionists are moral monsters.
“Enlightened discourse between opposing parties must assume good motives by all involved, and then go about asking the essential questions...”
Only someone intellectually dishonest would assume or even care about “good motives”. Would the author suggest that “enlightened discourse” would require us to assume “good motives” or care about motives on the part of Nazis in a discussion of whether Jews are “fully human”.
The proabortionists are moral monsters.
I find it interesting that it takes an educated idiot to figure out what we have all known all our lives. We can really rely on these people to help us understand.......wonderful.
The DNA of the zygote cell is it’s own, the DNA of the child.
The child’s DNA is different from the father’s - and also different from the mother’s DNA.
The zygote cell is therefore not of the mother’s body, as every cell of her body has her own DNA and the zygote’s DNA is that of the child.
Life begins when you become a conservative.
My husband used to say, “A fertilized egg is either a tomato or a person - which is it?” Only one answer.
Thank you for posting this!!
That’s easy enough for you to say but I’m becoming more and more convinced that Democrats are not human.
Many are in denial of this basic science