Posted on 11/16/2011 7:20:50 PM PST by TBBT
I have been agnostic on the Republican primary so far, but the time for choosing has arrived.
For the reasons set forth below, I believe that the primaries will come down to Mitt Romney versus Newt Gingrich. As such, the choice is not between Newt Gingrich and some hypothetical more perfect conservative candidate, as Newt’s most vocal critics would have us believe.
I’m supporting Newt Gingrich as the most conservative Republican who is electable and most qualified for the position of President.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Now when Newt's real record, as opposed to the Newt fluff pieces, starts coming out and we are all just suppose to shut up and worship at the shrine of St Newt.
Please, stay home in November. You haven’t a clue what is happening and apparently haven’t a perfect candidate to support, so please, just shut the hell up and stay out of the way. ... Now, if you have a candidate you think is good enough for your vote, share a few of the positives about your choice.
Now when Newt's real record, as opposed to the Newt fluff pieces, starts coming out and we are all just suppose to shut up and worship at the shrine of St Newt.
Youtube won’t load the videos ...
By the time your ilk finish the primary season, it won’t matter whom gets the pubby nomination because your ilk will have so well succeeded in suppressing/depressing conservative voters that whomever is nominated will have no chance of beating the huge black block vote, the bussed to the polls Hispanic vote, and the liebral dead head vote, all of which will be automatic for barry bassturd. You’re circular firing squad will have done what David Axelbastard could never accomplish from his lair. You will have destroyed the momentum and doomed the nation to final dissolution. Congratulations, you win! And whom was it again that you thought was so perfect that they deserve your vote?
Medicare is just slightly more complex to run than credit card transactions.
I shouldnt single out Newt on this nonsense too much as elections are just about telling every voter they will get something and no one will lose anything. Except Obama and Democrats are better at that game than Republicans are.
You think waaaaaayyyyy to much of the electorate.
Ya know, I’ve been married twice, and gone through divorced twice. I’m about sick of this holyer than thou spittle coming from self-righteous prigs. You definitely do not know the rel particualrs to what people go through in a failing marriage, but you hypocrites love to pontificate from your higholy place of self-righteousness and tell everyone what to believe regarding the divorce of someone else with whom you have chosen to have no quarter. It is becoming obvious that you require a perfect candidate, have not found that candidate, so you will trash every candidate and establish a nominee by default. PURPOSELY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY, you self-righteous prigs are workiNG for Milt Rominy (rhymes with hominy, the huskless corn product), and I think you know it but want to punish America for not being conservative enough for your high holy standards! I thank God that you tools are not the Tea Party. I know Tea Party folks, and they aren’t self-righteous prigs holding everyone up to an unrealistic standard of morality that I would guarantee you don’t even meet. You want spotless marriage history? Vote Mittens. But what about your perfection standards? You people make me sick, whining about a moral standard youy neither hold yourself to nor define accurately. You don’t know the personal particulars of both parties int he divorces, but that doesn’t stop hypocrites from pontificating from their bishoprics of bullfeathers!
Your insistence on posting lies tells me all I need to know about your deceitfulness. The tumor removed was not cancerous, so she was not in the hospital for ‘uternie cancer surgery’. But of it really means nothing to be truthful to one who is happy to serve lies as standard fair.
Try again. I just tried it and it was working. It’s a great speech! You need to watch all three parts.
So, concern troll, why don’t you post examples of this accusation that the Newt camp was aiding the scurrilous accusations aimed at Herman Cain? You filth have no idea how exposed your spittle leaves you. I’m a Newt Gingrich supporter. Try going back in my posts to defend your lie. I dare you, asshat.
I just tried again and it will not start. I even signed in and it will not start. I’ll keep trying.
Perhaps that’s true. But also remember, he said it in a way calculated to be used to hurt conservatives and kiss up to the media. And he knew it. No pass.
Gingrich defended him in the sex allegations.
Get the real facts on Gingrich supposedly divorcing his former wife when she had cancer. Gingrich's daughter clarified that situation.
MSNBC, Bill Maher, and The View are typically not a good source of information.
Why not listen to Gingrich's debate comments and the Contract.
Highlights From Full 90 Minute National Journal/CBS Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90Q8nn3RDyE&feature=player_embedded
.
Contract with America
http://www.newt.org/contract/videos
Cain is the MAN! Said it before. Now shut yer pie-hole!
That group-pie think thing seems infectious during the political season. Lots of nasty posters get together to attack any other candidate perceived to be a threat to their candidate being the default nominee. And when they do get their candidate the nomination by default rather than because of the strong points of their candidate, they wonder why the momentum in 2010 didn't elect Tea Party replacements in the House and Senate, as their default candidate goes down in a flaming squeaker of electoral college dissonance.
In the end, without momentum, those demanding their pie from the federal nanny get what they elect, and it is seldom pie as the bovine excrement piles up when the elected party promotes the quick destruction of capitalism and the American Way. That manna-pie is supposed to magically appear out of scatological rhetoric, I suppose.
Shut my pie hole? Hardly. That's like demanding that the promoters of the circular firing squad stop arranging the slaughter of all non-liberal candidates.
Posters at Freerepublic can post all the half-truths and condemnations of Newt's marital record they want, they can post all the media written scurrilous attacks they want, but I don't care one wit about those diversionary whines when my Republic is being assaulted from without and within. The death throes of this Republic resonant louder than the self-righteous whine of snapping perfectionist dogs.
These doing such dishonest attacks cannot name a man with clearer vision of our peril or more raw talent to address the problems. Newt Gingrich gets it, like Winston Churchill got it.
Newt explains it so the average guy and gal can see it clearly. Our peril is in militant Islam, and militant economic destruction (read Cloward-Piven writ as large as the commie-in-chief can write it), and militant secular humanism destroying the protective taboo structures which allow a Republic to have clear moral vision.
The circular firing sqaud noisies will try to supplant three marriages to divert from the reality that deviant sexual behavior is being pushed upon our society as normal!
I've been divorced. I know the complexities of a failing marriage are far more than what yield to soundbyte responses to scurrilous lies about those in that marriage. Think about it: have you been divorced or watched a friend or relative go through divorce? Is it as simple as these rabid self-righteous scum want to portray it? To their utter shame, these same accusers claim to be Christians, yet have not one scrap of forgiveness or reconciliation in their black hearts, because they are determined to crucify Newt Gingrich in order to establish some other candidate less able than he, by default!
A man with a sense of our historic peril who has offered a plan to address such peril is the only way We The People can avert our final collapse. we cannot stop the economic collpase by demanding things from a Congress which gave itself the right to amass wealth via legalizing their own insider trading. Only an executive who sees the peril and offers solid ways yo deal with the peril can lead US in this peril. We must elect a man whohas the vision and the insights from History which can address the peril.
Herman Cain is a good man. He loves this nation and wants with all his heart to help save it from destriuction. Rick Perry instinctively comprehends the purposed decline the progressives are carrying out. Michelle Bachmann has hands on experience with the piss and vinegar flowing freely in Congress. Rick Santorum is not just espousing pro-Life, he IS pro-life as evidenced in his life. Ron Paul sees the insidious power of the fed and wants to rein it in before our Republic is the fed's indentured servant.
We have a fine slate of candidates. But there is only one man who combines the brilliance of insight derived from knowing how we got here and what our Nation has come through, with the clarity of what it is going to take to pull US out of the death spiral we are now in. He can debate Barry Obama and show the world what an empty shirt the current pResident is. He can articulate a future for the war we must win against militant Islam, militant economic indenture, and militant secularism.
For those who want to maintain momentum for replacing Barry Soetoro and the criminal enterprise democRATS in House and Senate, lets post the videos of Newt speaking to We The People. When the invitation to join a circular firing squad is made, lets post video of a man sharing his insights derived from his brilliant knowledge of History. Let's oppose the DNC/Mitt Romney strategy of circular firing squad by posting the real video of the man for the job of taking back America.
I’ll be right over here if you need me.
IF Newt ends up being the nominee I will think about voting for him...
kerping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.