Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Hampshire Wakes Up to Obama's Social Security Fraud
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 16, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:19 PM PST by circumbendibus

A hearing is scheduled in front of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission on Friday to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, that raises allegations of fraudulent documents and fraudulent Social Security Number use on the part of Barack Obama.

The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.

The state holds the first primary for presidential elections, and that is scheduled for Jan. 10, 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: barelylegal; barishabazz; birthcertificate; butimachristian; certifigate; eligibility; eligibilityusurper; fakechristian; fraud; insidertrading; marthastewart; maybealittleblow; mymuslimfaith; mymuslimfarce; naturalborncitizen; newhampshire; obama; occupywhitehouse; phoney; phoneychristian; pretendchristian; pseudochristian; thegreatpretender; thistimeforsure; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-296 next last
To: little jeremiah
Hmmmm NH presidential election law, Natural born citizen clause, Statute changed in 2010, Orly Taitz ballot challenge, Obama 2007 signature
181 posted on 11/19/2011 9:19:06 PM PST by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Thanks, I’ll read it tomorrow.

This is insane. Who is going to stand up? Who is going to fight this coup? There are so few fighters and some idiots right here on FR are on the wrong side.


182 posted on 11/19/2011 9:32:26 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Check out # 166 for FReeper GregNH's commentary, as he attended 0rly's hearing, also. Then read comments through # 181.

Thanks, GregNH, good job.

183 posted on 11/19/2011 10:02:52 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; GregNH; All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=BUcyb5pmUKI

WATCH THE VIDEO...WATCH THE VIDEO...WATCH THE VIDEO...

Ok, so you don’t need to be told three times? Make that FOUR.
WATCH THE VIDEO!


184 posted on 11/19/2011 10:10:01 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

The video is almost fifty-eight minutes long, can you give us a thumbnail sketch? Cliffs Notes? Overview? Something? Anything?


185 posted on 11/19/2011 10:19:01 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

NO. You simply have to be patient and watch it. All of it. It’s probably one of the MOST IMPORTANT videos you will ever see. Trust me!


186 posted on 11/19/2011 10:24:00 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

thanks, Greg


187 posted on 11/19/2011 10:25:34 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer; GregNH; Fred Nerks; LucyT

Dr. Orly Taitz at 52:09:

“Yes, Mr. Obama gave you a check and a piece of paper for $1,000. Are they going to sell you countries for $1,000?”


188 posted on 11/19/2011 11:15:32 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911; LucyT; Fred Nerks

The video that Fred Nerks posted is the same as in comment 173. It is of the entire hearing. Basically Orly explaining her 85 page complaint that she submitted to the committee. Then the video in comment 166 is the Assistant AG questioning the Assistant SoS and Orly’s cross examination. This Assistant SoS is the one I have posted the email exchange of in comment 152. That email exchange points out that the Ass. Sos had set a precedent in 08 by disqualifying Mr Mohamed on the grounds that he didn’t meet Article II Sec 1 clause 5 because he admitted he was born in Egypt. But in this case we ignore the fact that Obama is not an NBC.

And when the Committee chair asked Orly if there had been a decision in the “many” law suites filed she said “no” and tried to go further but he cut her off saying “thank you, that is a no” That is was why I got up to testify and clear the record that there was never a decision because not one was heard on the merits for lack of standing.

IIMO that their minds were made up or made up for them before this hearing started. You can see in their lack of attention to testimony, their body language, and of course the decision just looked like they may have even rehearsed it.

There was alot that went on the hall after as well. I got into a shouting match with the jerk from Laconia Mr A. because I was basically telling him that they, the legislators, blew it last year when they failed to pass the ballot reform bill that would have forced dumbo to prove he is an NBC. Another rep told me they have another bill ready and he feels it will pass with a veto proof margin. I of course told him I will be watching. These sums of bitches now know who Greg Goss is for sure, and they know I am one pissed off natural born Citizen.

The comment in 166 is a letter to the editor of the Concord Monitor. I was interviewed by Maddie Hana for about 15 mins and she all she did was mention my name as a “self proclaimed natural born Citizen” the bitch. We will see if that gets published......


189 posted on 11/19/2011 11:23:07 PM PST by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

As you can tell I can’t sleep....


190 posted on 11/19/2011 11:27:42 PM PST by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

That’s one of the reasons I was hoping that everyone would take the time to watch the entire video...you can write about it all day long, someone can put up a complete transcript, but unless you see the attitude and the thickheadedness of the people involved, you just don’t get the full picture.

The form was completed correctly, the $ 1,000 was paid, and THAT’S THE PRICE OF YOUR COUNTRY.

It was at that moment Orly almost made me cry. I had a huge lump in my throat, I can tell you...and HEAPS of admiration for that woman!


191 posted on 11/19/2011 11:38:51 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
Nope! But she sure laughed loudly at it!

It was only at the stupidity of what you posted.

192 posted on 11/19/2011 11:58:28 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

I’ve seen this posted before. We all understand that as Minor defined it, the natives (as well as the natural-born citizens) are defined as those who are born in the country to parents who were its citizens. The decision in Luria is a paraphrasing, but not very accurately.


193 posted on 11/20/2011 12:02:29 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

You know about justia.com altering the cases that obtained minor v happersatt?


194 posted on 11/20/2011 4:31:19 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Maybe we should have a national day of prayer for our nation. The corruption is very deep and that Obama sits in the White House is merely a symptom of a much more deadly disease.
195 posted on 11/20/2011 4:35:44 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Very aware of that. Thanx.


196 posted on 11/20/2011 4:58:47 AM PST by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Thanks very much and I applaud your tenacity. Everything makes a lot more sense now.I agree that their minds were probably made up and lots of coercion probably went on from the higher ups in dc.It would not have been the first time and probably won't be the last.

One can only wonder what was promised to whom vs. what threats came along as well. The commiecrats will continue and try to head off any light that shows who Bari Schzbazz really is.

197 posted on 11/20/2011 6:29:01 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; LucyT

Good idea.


198 posted on 11/20/2011 9:02:03 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Reply to thread. I am not a lawyer, so this is just my laypersons take on the hearing.

I watched the whole video. The simple trick of the chairman calling the Assistant SOS as a witness and not the actual SOS was enough to prevent any questions being asked of the SOS under Oath that could in theory be legally actionable in a appeal.

In the heat of the Moment I don't think Orly spotted the trickery until after her time for questions was up.

The point is that the Assistant SOS is not the person legally responsible, so her evasions are not actionable.

Even if Orly had challenged and requested the Actual SOS as a witness, I think the chairman would have refused it.

The SOS was a Democrat, so this was always going to be a fix of some kind.

Virginia and Florida both have SOS type positions that are freshly appointed by the new state Governor when he/she is elected.

Both these governors are conservatives and may have appointed SOS’s that are serious about the US constitution.

Perhaps Orly should research these two states.

199 posted on 11/20/2011 9:34:45 AM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
What is the political composition of the NH Elections Committee whose hearing you attended and filmed? Are they all gubernatorial appointees?

What prompted them to hold the hearing? Are they required by law to do it whenever a state legislator objects to the SOS's placement of a candidate on the primary ballot?

200 posted on 11/20/2011 10:37:50 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson