Posted on 11/16/2011 6:31:19 PM PST by circumbendibus
A hearing is scheduled in front of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission on Friday to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, that raises allegations of fraudulent documents and fraudulent Social Security Number use on the part of Barack Obama.
The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.
The state holds the first primary for presidential elections, and that is scheduled for Jan. 10, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Did your Mommy help you type that??
It is no longer on Drudge...
8th picture in from the left.
'Birther' bid to derail Obama blocked Ballot Law Commission members called traitors
I attended the hearing of "birther" Dr. Orly Taitz'c challenge of Barack Obama akz Barry Soetoro, aka Soebarkah's name to appear on the 2012 Presidential ballot here in NH. I would like to point out, as I explained to staff writer Maddie Hana, that the birth certificate is not and never has been the issue. We who understand the issue have been labeled "birthers" and called nut jobs and other derogatory descriptions. It matters not where Obama was born. His citizenship at the time of his birth was British. He remains today a British subject.
The Constitution states in Article II, section 1, clause 5; "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." Seeing as how Obama was not a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution he needs to be a "natural born Citizen" and he is not.
That term was common knowledge to the founding fathers and is meant to mean "children born of parents who are Citizens on the land are natives, or natural born Citizens." This was articulated many times by the founding fathers and others. References in Supreme Court decisions for example Minor v Happersett 1870, http://supreme.justia.com/us/88/162/case.html , The Chief justice wrote the following; "The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
We also have a book held at the Boston public library that belonged to John Adams. Page 77 of his book describes natural born Citizens, or Subjects That can be seen here http://www.archive.org/stream/newabridgementof01baco#page/n8/mode/1up
Some claim that the 14th amendment defines natural born Citizen. The 14th amendment was written by John Bingham, "father of the 14th Amendment", the abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln's assassins, reaffirmed the definition known to the framers, not once, but twice during Congressional discussions of Citizenship pertaining to the upcoming 14th Amendment and a 3rd time nearly 4 years after the 14th was adopted. One example quote; "All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians." (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862)).
I could on and on. The definition is clear and Mr. Obama does not meet that definition. He released his birth certificate and it clearly shows that his father at the time of his birth was listed as "African" and not a US Citizen. The Elections Committee choose to hide behind a local statute that simply states that his papers and $1,000.00 check were in order, ignoring the fact that no law can supersede the Constitution, a Constitution that these committee members swore an oath to uphold and defend against all enemies both foreign and domestic. In other words, as Dr Orly pointed out at the hearing, anyone can get on the ballot if they submit a declaration form and a check. Shame on these people. and a check. Shame on these people.
I have video and another person is sending me his video as well. I will post later.
There were several NH reps there and all were outraged at the decision and marched across the street to SoS office. I did not go. I will assume that the SoS will say that he has to abide by the committees decision.....and so it continues.
I'm not actually surprised. In order for these people to do something, they have to admit to a mistake in the first place; Something which I think they just will not acknowledge.
Next step? Get someone on the ballot and file a lawsuit asking for an injunction.
I wonder if such a statement could be found in any of the old law books? I'll check Bacon's.
It sounds like a joke but it isn't. Here's what happened when we elected a POOPUS called 0kaka . The Communist regime's actions and threats force our agencies to look the other way when a foreigner runs for POTUS because they can't let the POOPUS to hit the fan!
Putin could say that he has credentials and experience running a pseudo superpower. He could also say that he advised 0b0z0 not to go Marxist... "We tried this here for 70 years and it didn't work!"
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/fec-ruling-opens-the-door-to-allow-any-foreigner-to-run-for-us-president/question-2188231/
More goodies here:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GPCK_enUS307&q=abdulhassan+running+for+US+president
.
Correction:
to hit the fan -————> hit the fan
Can u guys have a look this:
“Citizenship is membership in a political society and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society.
These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects, save that of eligibility to the Presidency. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162”
Luria v. United States, 231 US 9 - Supreme Court 1913
Their rulings were made behind closed doors, do we need to say anymore, and their attorneys probably received a phone call from the red phone that normally is used around 3:00 AM???
Here is a video of the entire event.
I was sworn in at 30:28 and testified shortly after at 40:20 but I think you should listen to whole video.
Nope! But she sure laughed loudly at it!
That's why the Bari Schabazz story is so intriguing. He could well have been born in NYC for all we know.
Thanks for the video. I would love to watch all 57 minutes but is there a summary somewhere?
Unf....ing unbelievable.Hard to imagine.
If these clowns had IQ's above 100 all they had to do is state that "its unclear as to who the hell this basturd is" and pass it along to a higher court,but no guts here.
Thanks for posting.
Thank you for posting and attending.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.