Replies

Heh. Same here. I never cared for Ann Coulter, found some of her remarks mildly amusing, but she completely lost me once she went on a scorched earth campaign to destroy Bush's conservative judicial nominees and constantly accused them of being socialist sleeper cells without one shed of evidence in her favor (to this day, she's never admitted she was wrong). From that point on, I realized she did more harm than good for American conservatism. But if you dared criticize Princess Ann, her fans would say you've bought into the "lies from liberal hate Ann sites" and that Princess Ann is such a wonderful principled conservative icon.

At least Ann Coulter's fan club stopped blathering on about "the rules" once she started hanging out with GOPproud.

Really, if you examine their careers, Coulter's fame differs little from Michael Moore's. Both will say anything and demagogue anyone or anything to get attention, not caring if their statements have any basis in fact.

Moore's personal life pretty much represents everything he claims to despise and rail against. Moore decries the evils of white men, America, corporations, the rich, fat cats, media propaganda, etc., and here's a guy who's an enormously successful white American male who got rich off corporations, lives like a king, and misleads people thru media manipulation.

Same with Coulter. She constantly goes on tirades against the Hollywood elite, screechy loudmouth women, homosexual activists, the liberal press, Muslims, premarital sex and casual dating without the santity of marriage, etc., and here's a loudmouth screechy women who wines and dines with the most notable liberal press and Hollywood elite, dates Muslims, headlines events for homosexual activists, constantly gets attention by saying something outrageous that the liberal press publishes, and sleeps around with all kinds of people without ever having been married.

I have to wonder if they believe 10% of the stuff that comes out of their mouth. They certainly don't practice it.