Ann Coulter: Picking ‘The Most Right Wing Candidate’ In Primary Is ‘Suicidal’

Breitbart TV ^ | 11-16-11 | Breitbart TV

[Lazlo in PA]

“Those who think ‘oh, absolutely, this is going to be 1980; we are going to run against Jimmy Carter’… and then there are those of us like me and apparently Governor Christie who think this guy is going to be tough to beat... The idea that you pick the most right-wing candidate without any concern over who can win is suicidal..."

Video at link...

[Luther1917]

Like someone who constantly puts down homosexuals, I have always thought that Coulter was a closet liberal. She can’t say a complete sentence without gigling and telling you how dumb liberals are. She over does it. We all know that liberalism is a mental disorder and we don’t need Coulter with her smirking and gigling telling us how dumb a liberal is.

So now she has finally came out of the closet. She has never been a conservative. True conservatives DO NOT SUPPORT the liberal Romney or the RINO Christie. That she is openly pimping for a man as liberal as Mitt Romney over a real conservative that would beat Obama in the general election shows Ann Coulter to be exactly she is. And that is an establishment RINO. She will vote for anyone as long as they have an R beside their name. I suspect that Faux News will be offering her a prime time talk show soon. Her politics are identical to the majority of the Faux News crew.

[Luther1917]

Any REAL conservative woman would be attacked to Perry over Romney. Perry is a real man, who actually goes finishing and hunting and can shoot a gun, and likes to drink a beer now and then. Mitt Romney is a goody-two-shoes who has never drank anything stronger than milk and wouldn’t know the barrel of a rifle from the stock. My wife calls him a girly man and of course I agree with her.

[Recovering_Democrat]

Thanks for providing me the definition. I always thought being conservative meant advocating what the Constitution and Founders wanted as defined in the first 7 articles and the first 10 amendments:

Articles I-III: clearly defined branches, with the Congress holding ALL legislative powers, the Presidency holding foreign affairs and enforcement powers, and the Judiciary resolving differences between parties regarding federal affairs.

Article IV: Equality of state’s citizens, etc.

Article V: Amending the Constitution.

Article VI-VII: Supremacy of the Constitution and Treaties, Ratification.

And of course, our modern applicable amendments:
Five Freedoms, Bearing Arms, Reasonable search and seizure, fair trials in criminal and civil cases, and the forgotten two: NATURAL RIGHTS not enumerated (#9) and the rights of the STATES and the PEOPLE (#10).

Now as bad as Mitt Romney might be in his policy decisions (his health law is admittedly costing his state MUCH more than expected, right?), I have not seen him advocating the federal government infringe upon any of the aformentioned Constitutional principles.

Hussein, on the other hand, HAS been one to advocate the eradication of these principles—most notably Amendments nine and ten...but also Amendments four and one.

I am not willing to label every endorser of Romney as someone who is not a conservative...hell, Sarah Palin endorsed John McCain for re-election in his Senate seat over the much more conservative J.D. Hayworth. Sarah isn’t a RINO...but John McCain *is* a RINO.

[Recovering_Democrat]

Yeah, I think Huntsman is much more liberal than Mitt. I think Huntsman is the most liberal one on the stage.

[riverdawg]

“Thank God that moderate Ronald Reagan beat out the uber-conservative Gerald Ford or we would have had four more years of Carter. /s LOL”

I think you are confusing 1976 and 1980.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Two words Ann:

1) Ronald
2) Reagan

[ReformationFan]

What’s happened to Ann? I want the Coulter of “Treason” and “Godless” back now!

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Yeah that’s sort of how I feel about my copie(s) of “Going Rogue” which I bought the first day they were available.

[wildbill]

Without reading all the comments I can just imagine the sound of suckng wind coming from all the Coulter fans who will now turn against their Queen of Rights as a closet liberal.

Folks, Obama starts with approximately 40% of the electorate in his Democrat coalition, just as the GOP candidate will start with about 40%.

The winner will persuade 11% (or more) of the remaining independent/undecided electorate.

I will be an “ABO” voter (anybody but Obama)

[PENANCE]

I love this argument (Ann's, not yours).

It boils down to this:

Ann: "I won't vote for 'Candidate X' -- and neither should you -- because he can't win."

Sane Person: "Why can't he win?"

Ann: "Because nobody is going to vote for him."

Sane Person: "Why will no one vote for him?"

Ann: "Because he can't win."

Sane Person: "I see."

pause

Sane Person: "So..., um..., Why is it that you won't vote for 'Candidate X'?"

Ann: "DUH! Because he can't win!"

Sane Person: "And that's because ...?"

Ann: "Nobody will vote for him."

Sane Person: "And so YOU won't vote for him?"

Ann: "Right!"

Sane Person: "Because he can't win?"

Ann: "Exactly."

Sane Person: "Because no one will vote for him?"

Ann: "Yes."

Sane Person: "Including you?"

Ann: "I just said that."

Sane Person: "And including anyone who takes your advice to not vote for him?"

Ann: "Obviously."

pause

Sane Person: "So, you won't vote for 'Candidate X' because nobody else will vote for 'Candidate X'?"

Ann: "Ye...(ulp), I mean .. uh, ... I didn't say that."

Sane Person: "And you're urging people not to vote for 'Candidate X' because neither you, nor anybody else, is going to vote for him?"

And on, and on, it goes. Until you're told that you WANT to lose (without ever defining the PURPOSE of winning), and that a vote for anyone but her preferred candidate is actually a vote FOR Obama.

[dfwgator]

I’m ABOOR. Anybody But Obama Or Romney.

[Avalon Hussar]

Like someone who constantly puts down homosexuals, I have always thought that Coulter was a closet liberal.

Listen to a person long enough and they will always tell you what they believe. Ann's doing it now, others have done it before. There's one talk show host in particular that I dread seeing finally go completely off the rails though because of how so many people have set him up as the prime example of how a Conservative actually should be. You don't gather figs of thistles and you don't see real conservatives doctor shopping and flying down to the Caribbean for weekend hookers. After all, how many times has he stated that he knows the liberal mind like the back of his hand? It's easy if you're going from first hand experience, isn't it Rush?

Just remember, figs from thistles and mark my words; Rush Limbaugh isn't what he pretends to be. He's a great entertainer, but he's not a conservative. Anyone who's listened to him for long enough will remember how his stance has changed over time from Republican in the 90's under Clinton to "Conservative" today.

[driftless2]

In 1964 Nelson Rockefeller probably would have gotten more votes than Barry Goldwater, but he still would have lost to Johnson. It’s far better to lose knowing you voted for the person who best expressed and exemplified your political and moral philosophy than to lose with someone you voted for while holding your nose. We nominate the best conservative we can...no moderates, i.e. Mitt Romney, need apply.

[Darren McCarty]

Huntsman's bad with his global warming and gay stuff, but he's pro 2nd Amendment. Romney says he is but his record is 100% anti. Romney raised taxes as well as governor. I don't plan on voting for either of them and consider them both center-left.

Gingrich I'm going more by his voting record than his recent talk. I think he and Perry are close on views however. I think valid arguments can be placed on either side depending on emphasis on global warming or illegal immigration.

I still don't know who I'm voting for. If I had to vote today, it'd probably be Cain. If Newt or Perry surge in the polls, I'll vote for either of them to stop Romney.

[wildbill]

Aye there’s the rub.

What if the choice comes down to either Obama or Romney?

[Getsmart64]

Hmm....So i guess what you’re saying is that basically, the ballot box has failed.

[dfwgator]

What if the choice comes down to either Obama or Romney?

Third Party for me....Obama is going to crush Romney like a bug anyway.

[chessplayer]

“My God, what happened to this woman? Does she honestly believe for even a micro-second that someone like Noobama could stand up to someone like Cain in a debate?:

---

Oh, good grief. Have you listened to Cain lately? He’ a walking gaffe machine,,,or he truly is clueless. obama would obliterate him in a debate.

[wildbill]

Coulter is right. Too many suicidal conservatives will be willing to let the Left win.

A third party will probably also screw up the Congressional elections and move the Dems into power completely.

Goodbye USA as we know it.

[dfwgator]

I say we focus on retaking the Senate instead of POTUS....if I had a choice between defeating Obama and winning the Senate, I’ll take winning the Senate, since Romney won’t be any better than Obama, anyway.