Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Marine) Ex-cop boots OWS heckler from congressman's swearing-in
NY Post ^ | November 14, 2011 | FRANK ROSARIO, DOUG AUER and BOB FREDERICKS

Posted on 11/14/2011 3:44:15 AM PST by lowbridge

Meet New York’s newest hero.

Kevin Hiltunen, a former NYPD officer, yesterday grabbed an Occupy Wall Street demonstrator by the collar and dragged him out of a Queens school where he’d been heckling US Rep. Bob Turner at the congressman’s swearing-in ceremony.

“I guess you could say I sorted him out,” said Hiltunen, 48, his jacket and tie barely mussed after dragging the scruffy protester out on his rear end.

“All I was doing was trying to stop this historic occasion from being disrupt-ed. There is a time and place to exercise your First Amendment rights,’’ said Hiltunen, of Bergen Beach, Brooklyn, who was identified by people at the ceremony as an ex-Marine.

“This was not the time or the venue,” Hiltunen added.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; occupywallstreet; ows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: freedomfiter2

Under the authority of common sense and common decency.
When children act out the adults must become corrective.


41 posted on 11/14/2011 5:17:09 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

LOL!!!


42 posted on 11/14/2011 5:17:21 AM PST by Stonewall Jackson (Democrats: "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
Let me know where it’s reported (link please), stating that this man was “security,

The article reports that he was not security but rather a supporter.....In other words, his right to enjoy the ceremony without disruption was being infringed upon so he took it upon himself to remove the disrupter......

Now, what would YOU have done?

How should have the disrupter been dealt with or should he have been allowed to remain and continue his disruption?

43 posted on 11/14/2011 5:17:32 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Agreed. that is the exact problem. Some “conservatives” don’t care about the Constitution or the Rule of Law they are supposedly “conserving.” If the situation was the one you presented, there would be chanted of “why I concealed carry,” “no body would lay a finger on me,” etc. etc. While I understand the hypocrisy (human nature), I still find it sad when I see it. I suppose people are tired of the way that their rights are trampled (I am, too), but some people rather than restore the balance and promote the rule of law, they want the shoe to be on the other foot so that they can in turn, trample the rights of others (two wrongs make a right, mentality). The problem is that that pendulum swings BOTH ways, and the shoe will always eventually be on the other foot.


44 posted on 11/14/2011 5:18:51 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

“Marines are there when you need them.”

I agree. And you can tell which posters here you can count on when the SHTF and which ones will be whimpering and hiding in the closets.


45 posted on 11/14/2011 5:19:18 AM PST by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Was this a private event on private property? I already asked that.


46 posted on 11/14/2011 5:20:04 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
Was this a private event on private property? I already asked that.

It doesn't matter......How would YOU have dealt with the disruptor?

47 posted on 11/14/2011 5:21:24 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

Sorry, we’ll have to disagree. I don’t believe you have the right to assault someone because they disagree with you.

Here’s the first amendment:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Well the good citizen was not the Congress. Just a good decent citizen showing an assclown that there is a place and time for everything and that he had picked the wrong place and wrong time.


48 posted on 11/14/2011 5:21:48 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
The article specifally says that rather than ask the man to stop speaking, or to leave, that as soon as the protester spoke,

From the article:

Holding a sign that read, “Rep. Turner [heart] the 1%,” Weissman remained seated and quiet until Turner, who was there with his wife, Peggy, took the stage about 1:30 p.m. and began to speak.

“He was close by to where I was standing, and he started yelling something about Bob Turner,” ...“So I grabbed him by his sweat shirt and escorted him out. I just had to do what was right. I was just here to witness this historic occasion.”

================================

The guy did nothing to the OWS guy as long as he sat quietly holding his sign. When the OWS guy started yelling, disrupting the event, is when the the man stepped up and restored order to the event.

No blood involved. No fisticuffs. Heck, it doesn't even look like the protester's hair is mussed. Now, I gotta go to work....

49 posted on 11/14/2011 5:22:59 AM PST by onemiddleamerican (FUBO and all your terrorist buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235
I want to know if speaking at a public meeting is one (a criminal act).

Not necessarily, but Distrubance of a Public Meeting certainly is. The event was a swearing-in ceremony, not a county council meeting.

Whether it is or not, we still have assault. And it’s still wrong. Defending YOUR person or property is one thing, physically attacking someone because you don’t like what they’re doing is another.

Distrubance of a Public Meeting

"Disturbance of a public meeting refers to the unlawful interference with the proceedings of a public assembly. Generally, any conduct that is contrary to the usages of a particular sort of meeting and class of persons assembled interferes with its due progress and services, or anything that is annoying to the congregation, is a disturbance. A meeting shall be disturbed when it is agitated, aroused from a state of repose, interrupted, or diverted from the object of the assembly"
http://definitions.uslegal.com/d/disturbance-of-a-public-meeting%20/

Cordially,

50 posted on 11/14/2011 5:26:04 AM PST by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
The dragee wasn't even spouting out typical Marxist nonsense but an objection that some conservatives of a certain mindset can endorse. According to the NY1 webset his protest was:

"Bob Turner has sold out Queens and Brooklyn voters by voting for the [South] Korea, Colombia and Panama free-trade agreements which will outsource 219,000 U.S. jobs to sweatshops,"

That may be a sentiment that his harmful economically, but it is certainly not Marxist, anti-American drivel.

51 posted on 11/14/2011 5:26:47 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Man, ya just gotta smile when you see that photo! A manly man TCB; I love it!

(You’ve got to wonder what kind of parents raised this kind of OWS trash. I remember when parents’ goals for their kids was to become productive members of society. The olden days, I guess.)


52 posted on 11/14/2011 5:30:15 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
You can bet, as we speak, ambulance chasing NYC lawyers are lining up the dragee for a lawsuit against the patriotic ex-Marine. Not to mention the NYPD will probably question his disability pension as the retired officer shows such dexterity in dispatching the mutt.
53 posted on 11/14/2011 5:30:50 AM PST by kenmcg (pROBLEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diamond

That is a well reasoned post, thank you, for providing that legal definition. Now, what is the law in New York concerning that matter. The article mentions no arrest (citizens’ or otherwise) of the protester for a crime, was he later charged?


54 posted on 11/14/2011 5:34:36 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

You are advocating “the heckler’s veto,” which effectively DENIES the free speech of those who were trying to speak before the heckler took over.

“The heckler’s veto” has never been held to be a 1st Amd right.


55 posted on 11/14/2011 5:35:26 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Well, if your questional is vague, then so will my answer be. Constitutionally/legally.


56 posted on 11/14/2011 5:37:50 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Anyone else notice how much like the Westboro Baptist Church bunch these OWSers look?


57 posted on 11/14/2011 5:37:59 AM PST by fwdude ("When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

how is the exmarine on disability? he has possibly dishonored himself with retirement fraud


58 posted on 11/14/2011 5:42:44 AM PST by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

the problem is he’s an excop because of a disability. so he gets paid to not work but is able to throw out a heckler. retirement fraud. he can’t work behind a desk? what’s his disability? it takes 20 yrs to retire. why couldn’t he work the last 5?


59 posted on 11/14/2011 5:45:27 AM PST by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

How do you heckle someone at a public meeting on public property? Or was this a private meeting on private property, or a private meeting on public property? Or is there a specific law in New York that prohibits protesting at public meetings? I specifically asked that, and have repeatedly stated that if the protester broke a law, that the situation is different, in that I would agree with a citizen’s arrest.

I have never heard of a “Heckler” except in a private meeting, and usually on private property, or where the “heckling” (specific activity) was a criminal behavior (ie. at a public meeting with a permit, warranting “disruption of a public meeting” etc.) The details make or break the argument of whether or not one or both of these men should be criminally liable for their actions.


60 posted on 11/14/2011 5:47:17 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson