Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

How big were the payloads? An atomic bomb is not light.


65 posted on 11/14/2011 4:39:49 PM PST by GAB-1955 (I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: GAB-1955
I'll have to look that up.

But I recall reading in the past couple of weeks that Iran had been meeting / consulting with N. Korea or Pakistan or some of the proliferation crowd about warheads small enough to fit in a satellite package; and also (was it the IAEA report?) that they were looking at components whose only obvious application was the non-fissionable components of a spherical compression fission device (i.e. plutonium).

NO cheers, unfortunately.

66 posted on 11/14/2011 9:32:01 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: GAB-1955
According to this site which covered development through May 2010, Iran was working on a booster to take a 330-kg payload into low Earth orbit.

And (ugh!) Huffington-Puffington quotes British Foreign Secretary William Hague speaking to the House of Commons that Iran had been testing missiles capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

No cheers, unfortunately.

67 posted on 11/21/2011 6:33:07 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson