Would we have even FReepers defending McQueary with “he may have thought it was consentual”?
FReepers are defending this?!
How the H*LL is anal sex with a TEN YEAR OLD CONSENTUAL?!?!?!
[FReepers are defending this?!
How the H*LL is anal sex with a TEN YEAR OLD CONSENTUAL?!?!?!]
The is exactly the question I was asking some fellow FReepers last night...but apparently, the reason McQueary didn’t stop Sandusky on the spot is because “he may have thought it was consentual.” So apparently if you witness a 10 year-old being raped, unless they are screaming and begging for your help, it is understandable that you would turn around and walk and be attending fundraisers with the child rapist within a month.