Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cult! A Classic False Claim
Mormon Defense League ^ | October 9, 2011 | Mormon Defense League

Posted on 11/12/2011 10:43:37 AM PST by Saundra Duffy

Some public figures have labeled the “Mormon” church as a “cult”. Most recently, ABC News reported that Dallas Pastor Robert Jeffress applied such a label in an interview following a political gathering where Jeffress introduced a political rival to Mormon candidate Mitt Romney.

Use of such a term to describe Mormonism is highly offensive to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “Cult” carries the connotation of dangerous, even violent groups whose beliefs are irrational and whose practices are immoral and lawless (Koresh and the Branch Davidians, Heaven’s Gate, Aum Shinrikyo, and The People’s Temple are all prominent examples) . The term cannot be applied to Mormons unless it is so broadly defined that its use could be applied to virtually any religious body.

Like racist language, the use of the word “cult” to describe a religion usually tells us very little about the religion, but a great deal about the person using the word. In short, it tells us only that the person using the label “cult” doesn’t like the religion in question, or thinks it is illegitimate. Bryan Wilson, a Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, and a noted sociologist of minority religions noted:

(Excerpt) Read more at mdl.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: classof98opus; cult; lds; mormon; opus; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 541-552 next last
To: Saundra Duffy; Osage Orange

Blah blah blah

SOMEone appears to be a FLIP-FLOPPER: just like her FAVORITE candidate!


441 posted on 11/14/2011 3:28:33 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Guess he found out that MORMONism had stolen a LOT of his life; eh?

That and his future income and that little thing called a soul.

442 posted on 11/14/2011 3:29:05 PM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

I asked for clarification and pointed out which aspects went into my own definition.

The definition as given could easily apply to ANY system of religions beliefs or practices.

I find that unsatisfactory that it is entirely up to the opinion of the person using the term rather than it being some sort of objective standard. But many words are like that in English.

Usually on this thread and seeing the definitions given .....

Cult = any system of belief or practices that differs significantly from my own.

By that definition Mormonism is decidedly a “cult” compared to actual Christianity.

I was wondering if Catholicism was included via the definition of another poster - but he chickened out.


443 posted on 11/14/2011 3:33:11 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

How about providing source links for this information you are posting about cults? Thanks.


444 posted on 11/14/2011 3:34:07 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (If other churches were dead dunking mormons to save them mormons would be furious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

It was a cute joke, but when time comes where I see many otherwise good people being purposefully led off the path to The Father I sorta get a little serious....


445 posted on 11/14/2011 3:34:41 PM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I told you that according to what I mean when I say the word - of course not.

I was interested in the applicability of the definition YOU provided, and what use YOU make of it.

Don’t chicken out.

Do you think Catholicism is a cult?


446 posted on 11/14/2011 3:34:53 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Like I said....

No worries.....

447 posted on 11/14/2011 3:35:03 PM PST by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
I am a native speaker of English.

I am my own source for what I mean when I say “cult”.

The definitions provided were clumsy at best, imprecise, and entirely subjective. As given it could be easily applied to any system of belief or religious practices.

I like my definition because it is simple, direct, cuts to the heart of the matter, and is objective.

HOW MUCH DOES A RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION WANT FROM ITS ADHERENTS?

448 posted on 11/14/2011 3:39:19 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Okay...I will try to be more specific.

a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.

LDS, Inc has pretty non-biblical "temple" rites..and ceremonies. Among many other things.

great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad.

LDS, Inc...has GREAT devotion to Joseph Smith and his ideas, words and Brigham Young, and his ideas, words...principally. But others followed.

Obsessive, especially faddish, devotion to or veneration for a person, principle, or thing. A religion or religious sect generally considered to be extremist or false, with its followers often living in an unconventional manner under the guidance of an authoritarian, charismatic leader.

Same as I wrote above....Note: Smith's and Young's very unconventional manner about marrying as many wife's as they could. And it continues right NOW....with various sects of LDS.

Is that clearer?

449 posted on 11/14/2011 3:48:35 PM PST by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

As a matter of the historic record - and as per application of what I mean when I say “cult”....

Mormonism was founded as a SEX CULT.

Joseph Smith thought your wife (if she was hot) should be 100% his property - and anybody who went along with THAT - obviously a cult member!

:)


450 posted on 11/14/2011 3:50:23 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

right click image, see properties.


451 posted on 11/14/2011 3:52:20 PM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
if she was hot

Obviously you've never seen these women.........

452 posted on 11/14/2011 3:53:08 PM PST by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Nope. No point. You have decided that it is your definition of cult that matters, not what is commonly recognized. So you go ahead and use your definition to your little hearts content and I will continue to expose the cult of mormonISM.


453 posted on 11/14/2011 3:53:40 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Wow, the IQ of the thread dropped 100 points with that posting.


454 posted on 11/14/2011 3:55:07 PM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
I knew...

Just being my sarcastic self.

455 posted on 11/14/2011 4:00:16 PM PST by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
If by ‘particular’ they mean ‘peculiar’ it makes it clearer - but that is purely subjective.

The definition doesn't mention the Bible, biblical, or non-biblical. It would apply to any particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.

Great devotion is also definitive in my definition, in particular the devotion showed in turning over your time money and assets (and sometimes wife).

Extremist is also definitive and something you can point to objectively. Although what is thought to be extreme can vary between cultures - there are certainly some objective standards of human conduct that some cults can definitively said to be an “extreme” deviation from. But “false”? False in religion is subjective.

Clearer but still unsatisfactory in that it seems either applicable to any religion - or based upon subjective criteria.

Mostly as I see it being used it means they are significantly different in belief from the speaker - thus my seeking clarity on if a different poster considered Catholics to be in a cult.

I commented above on the applicability of taking some other man's wife as being decidedly a cult.

Jeffords and his ilk - where with a phone call (or whatever) he could “reassign” a family to a different man.

That is cult behavior.

Mormonism was founded as a SEX CULT. Mormons who hold to Smith's ‘eternal covenant’ are still a SEX CULT.

456 posted on 11/14/2011 4:00:26 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

THX 1138


457 posted on 11/14/2011 4:00:55 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

OK, once again subjective!

If Joseph Smith (not known for being rational, reasonable, or particularly choosy) thought your wife was hot!

Mormonism was a SEX CULT!

Fundamentalist Mormons are still a SEX CULT!

Worse still, with ugly women! ;)


458 posted on 11/14/2011 4:04:02 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Sorry you don't see it........

It's okay....millions of people don't see the Democrats in Congress for what they are.

459 posted on 11/14/2011 4:07:04 PM PST by Osage Orange (Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Far be it from me to argue with progressive fashion experts.

Remember Clinton and the "briefs or boxers" inquiry? What, pray tell, might they ask Mitt.

460 posted on 11/14/2011 4:13:00 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 541-552 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson