Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

NASA's analysis of Rossi's E-Cat device. Their conclusion: Rossi didn't run the demos long enough to prove that they work.
1 posted on 11/10/2011 12:36:04 PM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Johnny B.

If it’s a scam I can’t see how he expects to cash in.


2 posted on 11/10/2011 12:38:25 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.
He's not allowed to say that.

He's only allowed to fall down on his knees in worship of the black box.

The science is settled. Shut up and hand over your money.

3 posted on 11/10/2011 12:42:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.<sup>®</sup>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

But... what is the impact for muslims?

NASA has given up on space, I think it’s time for a new name for them.

NGWMOA? National Global Warming and muslm Outreach Administration?

NOMA? National Outreach to muslims Agency?


4 posted on 11/10/2011 12:42:54 PM PST by brownsfan (Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

So the complaint is that it did not run 8 hrs (it only ran 5 1/2 hrs). So what are we going to be able to tell in the additonal 1 1/2 hrs that we were not able to tell by running it 5 1/2 hrs. I dont understand the logic here. Is 8 hrs some kind of break point that would eliminate a certain technology? If so, what?


9 posted on 11/10/2011 12:44:48 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

I’ve always believed Rossi to be a scam, however, it’s also hard to believe anything a NASA scientist claims anymore since James Hansen.


10 posted on 11/10/2011 12:44:57 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

Run one for a season at a tractor-pull.


15 posted on 11/10/2011 12:50:53 PM PST by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

I would also be cautious and skeptical because one of the promoters of the project has already sent a brag letter to Obama and Biden...so that he would likely use this potential development to further his campaign against existing fossil fuels.


16 posted on 11/10/2011 12:54:58 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.
It seems like it could be tested by taking a sample from the device before it ran and another sample after it ran and compared their element/isotope ratios. If the elements inside the E-cat have changed then either he has a nuclear reaction or has discovered the lost secrets of alchemy.
27 posted on 11/10/2011 1:17:45 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

ping


30 posted on 11/10/2011 1:27:35 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

Where’s KevMo on this?


34 posted on 11/10/2011 1:42:05 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.
I love the previous article to this one:
"Rossi Source for Foxx and MSNBC: Obama Teleported to Mars" [Article]
We might want to keep this in mind when we consider the quality of the "expert" speaking so enthusiastically about Rossi's E-Cat.
43 posted on 11/10/2011 2:20:57 PM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
FYI, HERE was Rossi's response to Krivit's original claim that the demo for NASA didn't work:
Andrea Rossi
September 29th, 2011 at 3:53 AM

WARNING:
THE SNAKE HAS WRITTEN IN HIS BLOG THAT NASA MADE A NOT POSITIVE TEST WITH US. THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE. I AM BOUND FROM A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND I CANNOT GIVE DETAILED INFORMATION, BUT I CAN SAY THAT:
1- WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH NASA, WHO WANTS TO TEST OUR ECATS TO TEST THE POSSIBILITY TO MAKE THEM USEFUL FOR THEIR PURPOSES
2- NASA’S DENNIS.M.BUSHNELL HAS SAID PUBILCLY THAT NASA WILL BUY AN E-CAT AS SOON AS IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO TEST IT
3- OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH NASA IS TOTALLY POSITIVE

IN A SEPARATE STATEMENT, A SNAKE’S ACCOLITE WROTE THAT THE TEST WE ARE GOING TO DO ON THE 6TH OF OCTOBER WILL BE ALWAYS MADE WITH STEAM. UNFORTUNATELY, WHEN YOU SPEAK WITH THIS PEOPLE YOU DEAL WITH PERSONS THAT HAVE REAL DIFFICULTIES TO UNDERSTAND A TITLE OF A NEWSPAPER IF THEY ARE AT THE SAME TIME CHEWING A GUM, BUT, JUST TO AVOID CONFUSION I REPEAT THAT:
THE MEASUREMENTS WILL BE MADE ON LIQUID WATER. WE WILL HAVE THE STEAM PRODUCED FROM THE REACTOR THAT WILL WORK IN A CLOSED LOOP, WHICH IS THE PRIMARY CIRCUIT, AND THE STEAM ITSELF EXCHANGES HEAT WITH THE LIQUID WATER IN A SECONDARY CLOSED LOOP, SO THAT THE WATER IS HEATED BY THE STEAM THROUGH THE WALLS OF A HEAT EXCHANGER. WE WILL MEASURE THE ENERGY TAKING THE DELTA T OF THE WATER, THE WATER, THE WATER, NOT OF THE STEAM NOT OF THE STEAM, NOT OF THE STEAM, THEREFORE THE ISSUE OF THE QUALITY OF THE STEAM HAS ABSOLUTELY NOT IMPORTANCE, BECAUSE WE DO NOT MEASURE THE ENERGY FROM THE STEAM !!!!!!! WE COULD PUT IN THE PRIMARY CIRCUIT STEAM DIATHERMIC OIL, GLYCOLE, COCA COLA: IT IS ABSOLUTELY IRRILEVANT WHICH IS THE FLUID IN THE PRIMARY CIRCUIT AS FOR CONCERNS THE MEASUREMENT OF THE ENERGY BECAUSE WE MEASURE THE ENERGY ONLY MULTIPLYING THE CUBIC METERS OF WATER FLOWING THROUGH THE SECONDARY CIRCUIT IN ONE HOUR BY THE DELTA T OBTAINED SUBTRACTING, FROM THE TEMPERATURE OF THE WATER (LIQUID) OF THE SECONDARY CIRCUIT AT THE EXIT FROM THE HEAT EXCHANGER, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE SAME LIQUID WATER AT THE INPUT OF THE SAME HEAT EXCHANGER.
ANDREA ROSSI


70 posted on 11/10/2011 5:46:44 PM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

these guys are just jealous of Rossi...their own scam, Global Warming, has been proven a flim-flam...


72 posted on 11/10/2011 5:54:29 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Johnny B.

Andrea Rossi failed to conclusively show that his device produced excess heat from a nuclear energy source.
***Maybe it’s a chemical thing after all. I’ve been saying that such an outcome would be preferable anyways. No NRC oversight.


89 posted on 11/10/2011 8:43:52 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I have some questions that maybe the Rossi fans can answer: Inquiring minds want to know!
110 posted on 11/11/2011 5:11:00 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson