If you compare anal rape of a child and the coverup that has gone along with it with under age drinking you need professional help and a conscience transplant because yours seems to be entirely non-functional. What other evil would you care to excuse so easily?
You show me where I made light of under age drinking in my statement and I’ll apologise leave FR forever. Since I didn’t, have the integrety to admit that. Talk about disgusting, you are this thread’s poster boy for it.
But when I’m dealing with someone who cannot aparently see the sheer evil of homosexual child rape, nor the evil of those covering it up, I have to think you and integerty ever met for lunch.
BTW did those boys have alcohol forced upon them or were they hit by a drunk driver? Since you say they were under age drinking I’ll assume that they UNFORTUNATELY suffered the very real consequence of a very stupid decision they made. Sometimes life’s lessons are quite harsh indeed.
I don’t think the victims of a pedophile chose their fate. It was literally thrust upon them. Notice the difference? Both situations are terrible, but using dead kids to attempt to defend your barf inducing position just makes you one very sick puppy.
Show ME where I have condoned, in any way, child rape. Show me where I have condoned evil in any way.
My original point was in reference to the pathetic defense of excusing crime except in “SPECIFIC” circumstances. I cited three examples: societal approval of underage drinking, drug abuse, and internet porn which has opened up a whole new world to child molesters. You latch on to underage drinking and say I am equating it to child rape. Show me where I equate the two. Saying I am using the death of a couple of kids to defend a position is a cheap shot. Especially from someone using raped boys as a plaform to make an argument.
Your personal attacks on me are proof of your limited intelect, and bad temper. Between us, I dare say, it is YOU who are in true need of professional help.
Try Anger Management.