Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

Show ME where I have condoned, in any way, child rape. Show me where I have condoned evil in any way.

My original point was in reference to the pathetic defense of excusing crime except in “SPECIFIC” circumstances. I cited three examples: societal approval of underage drinking, drug abuse, and internet porn which has opened up a whole new world to child molesters. You latch on to underage drinking and say I am equating it to child rape. Show me where I equate the two. Saying I am using the death of a couple of kids to defend a position is a cheap shot. Especially from someone using raped boys as a plaform to make an argument.

Your personal attacks on me are proof of your limited intelect, and bad temper. Between us, I dare say, it is YOU who are in true need of professional help.

Try Anger Management.


766 posted on 11/10/2011 1:23:47 PM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies ]


To: LeonardFMason

You are condeming people who are condeming child rape and those who have taken part in a coverup of it so what does that imply?

Try logic 101.
YOU brought up underage drinking in a discussion involving child rape as if the two are somehow moraly equivilant.
“Wow.

In EVERY inner city there are intersections where drugs are openly dealt. EVERYONE knows about it. The City Government, the police, and literally thousands of others. It goes on unabated. Everyone knows and no one does a thing to stop it. Deaths due to OD are the result. Some of them are children.

How responsible, MORALLY, are “those that let it continue”?

EVERY UNIVERSITY in America gives a “wink and a nod” to underage drinking. Every year kids die. How responsible, are “those that let it continue”.

WE ALL KNOW that the internet is full of child pornography.
It has made life so much easier for pedophiles. What is being done about it? If we stand by, and do nothing, knowing about it, are WE “those that let it continue”?

Right is Right and Evil is Evil no matter how close one is to a situation. Not being as close to the situation is a sorry, lame-ass excuse.

Why did the Lord Jesus say to the men, fully confident that they were about to do the right thing and stone the adulterous woman, “Let Him without sin cast the first stone.” None did. The Lord tells the woman “GO, and sin no more.”

Is there a pecking order of who to forgive? I’ll confess I’m in no mood to forgive Sandusky. He must be held legally responsible for the rape he has committed. Paterno, McQueary, and the others need to be held legally responsible too. If this is the one time in life these men(outside of Sandusky) failed to do the right thing, does that mean they are forever to be despised and rejected? How, and can, they ever make things right?”

I think you need to reread your full anf follow up posts for context. As in whining about us condemning people involved in child rape and you are concerned they won’t be forgiven because “the one time in life these men(outside of Sandusky) failed to do the right thing”.

You say you are in no mood to forgive and then condemn those who verbally confirm that position??? Contradict yourself much???


769 posted on 11/10/2011 1:42:30 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Chief Druid of Trollhenge: Cult of Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson