It sure sounds like she instigated the contact. But why did he, if true, upgrade her room? Why go out and not know what she wanted? Why drinks then dinner?
Again, if true. But it’s starting to seem Cain might have a habit of being too nice to younger ladies while he’s married.
There is compassion and then there is stupidity. As Billy Graham once said, he never put himself in a position, ever, to be alone with a female. Not even in an elevator, he’d get off.
I pray this is truly crap and it will backfire on the left.
She intimated it was him
“the room was upgraded”
but do we know for sure HE did that?
“As Billy Graham once said, he never put himself in a position, ever, to be alone with a female.”
Billy Graham was one very smart man.
Why it is our conservative candidates need to be as clean as the Pope every moment of their lives (and be able to prove it), while the leftist pukes can put ANY immoral, drug-snorting pervert in office, and we’re ruthlessly attacked for even bringing up the subject?
I agree with many others... at this point, I don’t care WHAT Herman Cain did or didn’t do. Though he’s nothing more than the best of a lousy selection of candidates, in my mind, I hope he gives them hell and comes out of this stronger. To smear one of our guys like this without any proof at all is a lowpoint... even for the leftist commie scum.
Like you said... if true.
But I do agree... the proper approach is to be cold and businesslike in today's uber-sensitive and litigious America. Never compliment anyone individually on anything pertaining to appearance. Keep the conversations on business matters only... no small talk, no friendliness beyond the level of cordiality required to foster a professional environment. If subordinates think of you as pompous, too damned bad. It's far better to be depicted that way than to have the crap Cain is undergoing heaped on you.
And NEVER... EVER... be alone with a subordinate or potential subordinate of the opposite sex. That is nothing but an invitation to major trouble. Cain has said he had a policy of keeping the office door open and remaining visible to the outside office whenever a female entered, so these claims should be viewed with a great deal of skepticism. Keeping actions above and beyond reproach, IMO, is the best way.
Why do you believe any of this? There is no credible evidence any of this happened—or happened the way it’s being portrayed. Every day the original accuser’s story changes; and every day or so new anonymous accusers with no credibility are trotted out.
Do you not see the parallel to the Justice Thomas lynching?