[Pravious]

“Next question -— How is Sharon Bialek going to PROVE that what she said is true?”

Exactly. If she doesn’t have proof, nothing she says means SQUAT.

If this works, any leftist can come forward and say anything about ANY of our candidates, in an attempt to knock them out of the box - and we have absolutely no recourse.

[ScottinVA]

If this works, any leftist can come forward and say anything about ANY of our candidates, in an attempt to knock them out of the box - and we have absolutely no recourse.

Bet that it will, regardless of who the nominee is.

[Sam Gamgee]

Which is why Cain can’t pull out now. If he does, then the left can pull this crap off whenever they want.

[william clark]

You know, I’m not close to convinced that any of this happened, but even if I came to believe it did, I think that, as disappointed as I’d be in Cain, I’d have a hard time not adopting the position of “You know, you liberals went to the wall to convince everyone that ‘just sex’ wasn’t important when evaluating a President’s behavior, so I’m gonna hold you to it, and disregard it in my evaluation of this presidential candidate. As of now, you have no say in the matter.”

[SERKIT]

Exactly. If she doesn’t have proof, nothing she says means SQUAT.

Herman Cain's fingerprints in pizza grease across the back of her head, or up her legs near her hoo-haw?

[Baynative]

"How is Sharon Bialek going to PROVE that what she said is true?”

Allred's "team" is scouring the country to find a boyfriend and mentor to collaborate her story ...stay tuned!

[redgolum]

I things of this nature, the accused has to prove his innocence. Even in a court of law (ask many of the men accused of sexual harassment).

The way around this is to never, and I mean never, be along with a women unless there is at least one witness. Many corporations have such rules at the middle management level.