[samtheman]

Why would you bring Newt Gingrich into a discussion of how the establishment is trying to lynch Herman Cain?

Unless you believe Newt Gingrich is a party to that lynching.

Or unless you believe it’s not a lynching, that the establishment is justified in putting a noose around Herman Cain’s neck, and that the only appropriate response in that case is to deflect public attention to “some other bad guy”?

So which is it?

Are you trying to deflect attention to “some other bad guy” or do you believe that Newt is in cahoots with the lynch mob?

And remember, it was YOU who brought New Gingrich into a discussion involving the attempted lynching of Herman Cain, not ME.

Just please remember that.

[Responsibility2nd]

For that last time.... This is what I said

 

Just as what Clinton did affected the entire country, so what ANY candidate does if they mess around is open for public debate. If we know they are a sleaze personally, we know they will be a public sleaze also. That's why I will never vote for Newt.

So. Now do you get it? I've not tried to place the blame on Newt. I'm blaming Clinton for all of Herman's problems.

 

(Dude - you're right. It IS fun to post while smoking crack)