Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flavius

Nobody’s fracking where these earthquakes are, genius. The fracking is in the S and SW parts of the state, this is in central east, hundreds of miles away.


59 posted on 11/05/2011 9:29:53 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

This sure wasn’t where anybody expected an earthquake to be. If one just happened at a fracking site (these were thankfully far away), can you imagine the lawsuits? Whether or not it was a coinky-dink?


71 posted on 11/05/2011 9:36:51 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
Nobody’s fracking where these earthquakes are, genius. The fracking is in the S and SW parts of the state, this is in central east, hundreds of miles away.

I can't imagine that anyone with half a brain would believe that fracking shale would cause an earthquake. The amount of energy required to cause a 5.2 earthquake, which is the equivalent of more than 480 metric tons of TNT, is not possible when fracking.

Besides Shale is soft compared to bedrock. I don't believe that shale rubbing together would cause seismic activity on that scale.

161 posted on 11/06/2011 4:57:48 AM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson