Well, Anderson was available and has a good reputation so Perry hired him, so what? Anderson claims he didn’t tell anyone, said anything he has told any publication he has nothing to hide and they can reveal, he didn’t work on Cain’s Presidential Campaign, worked for him in 2004... and now Cain said he “may” have told Anderson, doesn’t remember for sure and Anderson says he didn’t know... but what Cain said is the real issue, this was not a surprise to him, if his original story is to be believed then he was worried about this coming out in 2004 and THAT is the real story, now who Rick Perry hired for his campaign....... or..... does it only matter if a potential President is another Billy Clinton if the man has a D after his name??? is that what you really believe? I am not so invested in any candidate to give him or her a pass just because they have an R behind their name.
You have a penchant for missing the point. Had you read my post, you wouldn’t have wasted all the ink rehashing this leak story. Frankly, I doubt Perry camp leaked the story. Nor have I claimed they did.
What I’m saying is that Perry *did* hire Anderson because he worked for Cain in the past. Anyone who believes it was only because he came “highly recommended” is naive. Face it, Cain was the guy rocketing in the polls. If you needed advice on stopping someone like Cain, what better way than to hire a guy who worked for him on a previous campaign?
You can send me another half page of text on this leak/no leak thing if you want, but I’m not going to read it. I don’t need you to try to convince me of something I already believe in the first place.