You have a penchant for missing the point. Had you read my post, you wouldn’t have wasted all the ink rehashing this leak story. Frankly, I doubt Perry camp leaked the story. Nor have I claimed they did.
What I’m saying is that Perry *did* hire Anderson because he worked for Cain in the past. Anyone who believes it was only because he came “highly recommended” is naive. Face it, Cain was the guy rocketing in the polls. If you needed advice on stopping someone like Cain, what better way than to hire a guy who worked for him on a previous campaign?
You can send me another half page of text on this leak/no leak thing if you want, but I’m not going to read it. I don’t need you to try to convince me of something I already believe in the first place.
Most likely.
Some here though would probably call your accusation "baseless".
LOL!
From the interview I just read and posted with Anderson, it doesn’t look to me like he would use privileged information he learned from the Cain campaign to help Perry.
And since Cain lost that campaign pretty soundly, I really doubt there is anything rom that campaign that would be helpful to Perry, or about how Cain operates.
Anderson has served a lot of clients. He’s apparently good, and apparently very ethical, and a good man.
And I say SO WHAT!!!!! In your world Perry should never hire an accomplished person to work for his campaign who worked for your hero Cain... I disagree, you know the saying: all is fair in love and politics.