[shield]

People on the right are acting exactly as the left did toward Clinton. They continue to justify Cain's actions. Then you have obama that will not take any blame or responsibility, it is always someone else's fault.

Cain needs to grit up his loins and be a man. Not only is he lying, he is pointing his finger all around him instead of what he should have done in the first place. Admit his error ask forgiveness and moved on. Now he is using rules for radicals as a tactic. Boy, we do not need another obama or a clinton in the WH with a R after his name.

[buccaneer81]

Boy, we do not need another obama or a clinton in the WH with a R after his name.

We also don't need a dumber, less articulate GWB-clone Texan either.

[Reagan Man]

I caught Cain on Hannity today and he’s still being evasive on this sex scandal issue. And he is still blaming Perry even though there is no evidence to support his dumb accusation.

Of course Hannity was doing his best to run cover for Cain. Just like Rush did on on his show today. Guess we know who Rush and Hannity will be supporting.

[editor-surveyor]

Thank you Mr. Alinsky!

Cain’s actions do not need to be justified; they are pristine WRT this current Perry attack.

Cain is the only man in this election cycle. He made no error, but you certainly did with this sleezy troll piece.

[Yaelle]

People on the right are acting exactly as the left did toward Clinton. They continue to justify Cain’s actions.

---

Nope. You’re missing the point. We don’t have the luxury of 12 great perfect Cains waiting in the wings. The only one there waiting is mitt Romney. I don’t see perry making it. And newt has more baggage than Cain! Stop killing imperfect candidates and help us get a conservative in the white house.

[rob777]

"People on the right are acting exactly as the left did toward Clinton. They continue to justify Cain's actions. Then you have obama that will not take any blame or responsibility, it is always someone else's fault."


I find this to be problematic. I am not ready to condemn Cain, as I do not have all the facts. At the same time, I am not willing to jump forward and attack his critics either without having the facts. I am in a "wait and see" mode when it comes to the actual accusations. I do agree with some of his critics who argue that the handling of the whole thing was done badly and am absolutely disgusted by those who are calling the unidentified women names merely for making the accusations. This reminds me of the Clinton supporters smearing Paula Jones.

[novemberslady]

People on the right are acting exactly as the left did toward Clinton. They continue to justify Cain's actions.

Yesterday while reading one of the Cain threads two posters were saying that it didn't matter they were voting for Cain no matter what.
This next part made me laugh out loud.

To drive their point home one says that if Herman was having relations with a goat, they'd still vote for him.

The other poster answers that they'd hold the goat for Herman and still vote for him.

I would give them a courtesy ping if I could remember who they were.

It was funny stuff.
Me, I'm not voting for anyone messing with a goat.