Well then Cain needs to fire him, and I mean yesterday.
You don’t go off half-cocked with an allegation you can’t prove, especially when it could cause your party to implode.
The Cain campaign is looking like amateur hour.
Unnamed accusers with unnamed infractions, no problem.
Named person who moved from Cain’s campaign to Perry’s and was accused because he was made aware of Cain’s past before he left... now there’s a problem.
I get a real hoot out of folks who are not offended by faceless unquantified rumors, but think it’s a real scandal if someone is named and accused because they were privy to sensitive information.
Cain’s team had every right to be suspicious, and voice those suspicions.
If someone on my team left when I was peaking, went to my opponent’s team, and all of a sudden unsubstantiated rumors hit the media, I’d be calling them on it too.
Cain has denied impropriety. They guy who left Cain’s team has denied impropriety. Cain is called on it, and the other guy is believed lock stock and barrel. Why is that?