Again: She went to the cops and said she slept with the guy! She told the cops she was 14! If she did or didn’t tell the guy she was 19,(And if she lies THAT much,who knows?),the law says he’s guilty anyway! Hell! If she went to a bar with a fake ID and got served,it’s the bartender they take away in cuffs!Fair or unfair,that’s the law! If we don’t agree with the law,it’s up to us as voters to try and get the laws changed!Beyond that,what else can be done?
But again,it looks like he’s in enough trouble now that they find out he hasn’t registered as a sex-offender. Looks like he might not find himself in a position to be accused of ANYTHING else for a spell....
No, please don't make up facts. Let's stick to what actually happened, not what you wish had happened.
Police received information that a 14-year-old runaway from Garland was at the camp. Police checked the area and found the girl. During an interview, she revealed that she had had sex with a man in a tent. Armstrong was identified as that man and arrested.
Did you read the article? You seem to have judged him, convicted him and are apparently making up the facts as you go along. So far, we have cops looking for a runaway; they find her. She said she had sex with 'that' guy. So far, so good?
Not the article goes on to say that she told the guy that she was 19. Does that establish the reliability of the girl's integrity? She lied to the accused 'rapist' about her age. That is what she freely admitted to the police; as part of their interview.
So, what do we have? We have a girl who told a guy she was 19, and then she said she had sex with him. How old do you THINK he thought she was? All factual evidence points to 19, right?
Those are the facts ... all right there in the article for you to read.