Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Admits Its Nuclear Negotiating Strategy is to Run Down the Clock
Pundicity/MichaelRubin ^ | Nov 1, 2011 | Michael Rubin

Posted on 11/01/2011 5:08:15 PM PDT by nuconvert

If the Islamic Republic of Iran has one trait that worries me, it is overconfidence. After all, wars in the Middle East are caused not by oil or water, but rather by one side fundamentally underestimating the capacity of its adversary to respond. That was the case, for example, with the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War​. After that conflict, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah commented that had he known how Israel would have reacted, he never would have launched the cross border operation to kidnap the Israelis in the first place.

Sometimes that overconfidence can have a silver-lining, however.

Last week, former Iranian nuclear negotiator Hassan Rowhani​ gave an interview in which he bragged about Iran's negotiating strategy:

"We did not decide the nuclear goals of the country; they were decided by the regime. When I was trusted with the responsibility of the nuclear team, two goals became our priorities: The first goal was to safeguard the national security, and the second goal was to support and help the nuclear achievements…

When I was entrusted with this portfolio, we had no production in Isfahan. We couldn't produce UF4 or UF6. Had Natanz been filled with centrifuges, we did not have the material which needed to be injected. There was a small amount of UF6 which we had previously procured from certain countries and this was what we had at our disposal. But the Isfahan facilities had to be completed before it could remake yellow cake to UF4 and UF6. We used the opportunity [provided by talks] to do so and completed the Isfahan facilities… In Arak we continued our efforts and achieved heavy water…

The reason for inviting the three European foreign ministers to Tehran and for the Saadabad negotiations was to make Europe oppose the United States so that the issue was not submitted to the Security Council."

Several years ago, I penned a piece for The Wall Street Journal highlighting other revealing instances in which Iranian officials acknowledged their own insincerity.

Alas, neither Iranian statements nor actions appear enough to force the State Department to face reality. Talk will not resolve the Iranian nuclear challenge. Rather, talk is a tactic the Iranians use—and now admit using—to run down the clock.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; michaelrubin; nukes

1 posted on 11/01/2011 5:08:17 PM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

File under: Golly, ya think so? ;-)


2 posted on 11/01/2011 5:09:40 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

With our affirmative action POTUS at the helm they are assured pretty much of anything they want. Too dumb as far as international politics are concerned to pour water out of a boot with directions on the heel.


3 posted on 11/01/2011 5:38:43 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Am thinking even if the Iranians dropped a nuke on NY, the other commander-in-chief will end up invading Tajikistan. Later, most probably, his propaganda machine will call it “compass malfunction”.


4 posted on 11/01/2011 6:13:00 PM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson