Under what cause of action can a County Sheriff in Arizona claim jurisdiction over the privacy statutes of the State of Hawaii?
Wouldn’t a dispute between states instead require a federal court filing?
It doesn't work that way. The Sheriff can keep Obama off the ballot (in his county) unless Obama complies to the Sheriff's satisfaction. Obama would have to go to court to stop him, at which time the Sheriff can present evidence and demand discovery. Not a good move for Obama.
Wouldn’t a dispute between states instead require a federal court filing?
If the Sheriff wanted something from Hawaii, sure. But Obama wants something from Maricopa county, (ballot access.) not the other way around. If Jan Brewer hadn't been such a backstabber, the entire State would be a trap for Obama.
Maybe an investigation of perjury committed against the State of Arizona when Obama signed an affidavit claiming to be Constitutionally eligible to be President...
The privacy laws of Hawaii no longer apply to Obama’s BC because he released a copy to the press.
After a long stonewall, Obama finally released a BC because of the growing movement of key states to pass laws to examine BCs as part of eligibility verifications. In other words, Obama blinked. Now the birther detectives are calling him on the card he played.
A federal court has already ordered that the original long form BC said to be held by the State of Hawaii is to be released but the Hawaii Department of Records is Stonewalling the order. They have until November 21 to produce it.
Since the BC has been ordered to be released, there is nothing stopping Arizona from requesting to examine it for ballot listing purposes.