Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red State and Free Republic Declare War on Mitt Romney Supporters for Some Reason [JR post 132]
Myth Romney Central ^

Posted on 10/29/2011 8:05:02 AM PDT by mnehring

Edited on 10/29/2011 2:08:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-454 next last
To: onyx
religion isn’t one of our reasons

Exactly right!


The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

201 posted on 10/29/2011 3:12:00 PM PDT by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

MYTH had better hope a lot of women, communists, and homosexuals come out, but looks like the communists and homosexuals will be voting for Obama again.

Guess that leaves women.
____________________________________________

I doubt it

Mormonismn has had a history of racist and sexist bighotry and discrimination right from its start...


202 posted on 10/29/2011 3:15:23 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (If we give Sandy a ladder will she preach from the temple roof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
The Constitution doesn't tell me that I cannot use religion as a reason to either vote for against a candidate.
203 posted on 10/29/2011 3:16:19 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (If other churches were dead dunking mormons to save them mormons would be furious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
_________________________________________

Whats that got to do with my vote ???


204 posted on 10/29/2011 3:16:38 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (If we give Sandy a ladder will she preach from the temple roof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Ohhhh! It gets under their skin. Kinda like 0bama.


205 posted on 10/29/2011 3:17:16 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

DONATE


206 posted on 10/29/2011 3:17:28 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Great, huh??? Love you!


207 posted on 10/29/2011 3:18:49 PM PDT by Hildy ("When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - SocratesH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
Thanks very much. His religion isn't one of my reasons and his religion doesn't prohibit him from running for office.

Voters can use it against him and that's their right.

Voters can vote for or against any candidate for any reason. Bigotry, hate, (racism for obama), whatever.

I don't give a rip.

My point is, I'm not for Romney because he's not a conservative. I view him as a poseur and worse.

This election is too important. Romney can and must be stopped in the primaries.

208 posted on 10/29/2011 3:23:37 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Oh yes, people have already been playing the religious hatred card on Romney. The problem isn’t his religion, it’s that he’s a progressive RINO slug.

Very true. I'm a Mormon, and I don't have any desire to vote for Romney, mainly because I don't think he has any convictions. I don't think he has a well-thought out core of political principles. He will pander and say whatever he needs to say out of political expediency, rather than acting out of the firm belief that this is the proper course of action which will benefit the country and preserve or enhance our liberties.

209 posted on 10/29/2011 3:24:05 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Insanity runs in my family. It practically gallops. -- Mortimer Brewster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Designer
President Obama is scared to death of facing Mitt Romney

I think Zero wants to debate either Mitt or Perry...he lives in terror of having to face someone like Newt or Cain.. In fact, I doubt he would debate them if they get the nom.

210 posted on 10/29/2011 3:24:15 PM PDT by Bobalu (More rubble, less trouble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

True. We are not asked why we voted for whom... yet.


211 posted on 10/29/2011 3:25:23 PM PDT by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

If I had noticed that you were the poster, I would have known better. Sorry. When I saw the content of the post, I wondered how it could have had over a 100 replies without being zotted.


212 posted on 10/29/2011 3:25:23 PM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

“Oh yes, people have already been playing the religious hatred card on Romney.”

It is not “religious hatred” to practice discernment and object to the blasphemy, heresy and apostasy of Mormonism that worships a false god, false jesus and false prophet. You do realize that Willard actually believes that he will be a god someday with his own planet populated with people that will worship him.


213 posted on 10/29/2011 3:26:19 PM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

That is true, no doubt.


214 posted on 10/29/2011 3:26:39 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

placemark


215 posted on 10/29/2011 3:26:49 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (I will not be silenced. Winners do not compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Well, they don’t allow free speech in communist countries, do they?

Saundra, you should know better. It's not a free speech issue to be posting on FR, you can free speech anywhere you want -- and thusly your rights are not violated -- except perhaps FR (if you post love for MittR) or RedState.

216 posted on 10/29/2011 3:27:01 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I guess some Occupiers are more 99% than other Occupiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: onyx

BTTT


217 posted on 10/29/2011 3:27:19 PM PDT by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
... best in the debates bar none...

I would have to say that Newt Gingrich holds that distinction. Hands down.

And while Gingrich is not in my list of favored candidates, I'd take him over Romney without hesitation.

218 posted on 10/29/2011 3:27:54 PM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Well, they don’t allow free speech in communist countries, do they?

My gawd, that comment is stunning in its juvenile stupidity.

You are free to start your own blog or website and spout whatever opinion you want.

But the First Amendment doesn't stop with freedom of speech - it also clearly implies freedom of association, and Jim says he doesn't want to associate with Romney-pimping RINOs. You apparently think Jim should be forced to allow viewpoints on FR that he vehemently disagrees with.

So who is the one taking an anti-freedom approach here? Look in the mirror for the answer, Saundra. It is not censorship for Jim to set standards for his own website.

219 posted on 10/29/2011 3:27:59 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I agree with absolutely everything you posted.

Problem is, Romney governed a liberal state and expresses liberal views.

So, you are championing a competent liberal, which is the worst of all possible kinds.

220 posted on 10/29/2011 3:28:25 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I guess some Occupiers are more 99% than other Occupiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson