Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grunthor

20%, no taxation of savings, and big exemptions vs 18%, taxation of savings, and 0% income tax for “low income” people.

Cain’s proposal is better than what we have, and I would gladly support it, but technically and politically Perry’s is better.


5 posted on 10/24/2011 1:54:36 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: achilles2000

“Cain’s proposal is better than what we have, and I would gladly support it, but technically and politically Perry’s is better.”

By far...absofinglutely.


15 posted on 10/24/2011 2:03:15 PM PDT by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

How did you come up with 18%?


29 posted on 10/24/2011 2:13:53 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

999 doesn’t tax savings.


33 posted on 10/24/2011 2:18:12 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: achilles2000

Uh, Perry’s plan won’t tax “low-income” people, either, with a $12,500 deduction.


87 posted on 10/24/2011 4:50:59 PM PDT by Politicalmom (I am intrigued and open to the Bush administrationÂ’s amnesty proposal. -Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson