Posted on 10/23/2011 2:08:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
In December of 1966, Lynn White, Jr. (1907-1987) delivered a controversial speech in Washington, D.C. entitled "The historical roots of our ecological crisis." White charged that Christianity "bears a huge burden of guilt" in helping to foster the present-day "out of control" degradation of the environment. White singled out Western Christianity as being primarily responsible for the wedding between science and technology that has left a devastating ecological scar on the modern landscape.
[BIG snip]
Greens are well aware of the fact that in order for the environmental movement to carry any weight in modern society, it must have its scientific credentials. Joining hands with Naturalism and Darwinism against Christianity, they therefore have infiltrated the modern science department and clothed themselves with every manner of scientific jargon imaginable in order to give all the appearance of an authoritative discipline.
This subterfuge has also allowed the greens to criticize Christianity from two directions at the same time. On the one hand, Western Christianity has allegedly created the scientific revolution that has raided the ecology of the planet. On the other hand, since many Christians refuse to bow to Darwinism, Christianity is also considered anti-science. This incongruent criticism should cause much more pause about the relationship between Christianity and science than is typically given. Darwinism does not have a monopoly on science. What's more is that if leftists are so into science, then why have so many of them embraced the environmental movement, which is loaded with Romantic, anti-scientific views?
Modern ecology appears to be attempting to return to the "sciences" of the Greco-Romanworld, replete with all of its pagan hesitation and superstition, yet dressed up in holistic scientific language that forbids many of the consequences of the scientific revolution. This is the heart of Romanticism and holism, not science per se.............
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Trofim Lysenko ..........."Lysenko himself spent much time denouncing academic scientists and geneticists, claiming that their isolated laboratory work was not helping the Soviet people. By 1929 Lysenko's skeptics were politically censured, accused of offering only criticisms, and for failing to prescribe any new solutions themselves. In December 1929, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin gave a famous speech praising "practice" above "theory", elevating the political bosses above the scientists and technical specialists.
Though for a period the Soviet government under Stalin continued its support of agricultural scientists, after 1935 the balance of power abruptly swung towards Lysenko and his followers.
Lysenko was put in charge of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences of the Soviet Union and made responsible for ending the propagation of "harmful" ideas among Soviet scientists. Lysenko served this purpose by causing the expulsion, imprisonment, and death of hundreds of scientists and eliminating all study and research involving Mendelian genetics throughout the Soviet Union. This period is known as Lysenkoism.
He bears particular responsibility for the persecution of his predecessor and rival, prominent Soviet biologist Nikolai Vavilov, which ended in 1943 with the imprisoned Vavilov's death by starvation. In 1941 Lysenko was awarded the Stalin Prize."
bflr
What a super link list!
Bump!
I will ride side by side in any vehicle with you on this issue. Have a super Sunday.
BTW, this Jaguars Fan is a Denver Fan today. Go Tebow!
Super Sunday
Bump!
Researchers have correctly traced so-called environmentalism to pre-Nazi Germany. After the Nazis took over, the party embraced “environmentalism” as a tool to control private property for the good of the state. By 1939, 75% of Germany’s nature groups had pledged fealty to Nazism.
Now Germany’s nature groups have been resurrected in America. Just as in Nazi Germany, these eco-fascists are running around and illegally stealing private property for the good of the collective state. Anytime you see a so-called “environmentalist,” you are looking at a goosestepping 1930’s fascist.
How lucky the public is that the major media are sparing no effort to ensure that the sordid historical spectacle of Lysenkoism is placed front and center in all discussions of AGW theory and public policy environmental initiatives....
NOT!
The major media are intellectually incurious social climbers to a man. They have no more interest in our complex climate than a pig has in astronomy.
What passes for ‘religion’ here went commie a generation ago.
Amen! Super link list exposing the new paganism.
bttt
This item below is related and is a good bookmark for future reference:
From the National Wilderness Institute.
Individuals, Liberty and the Environment
http://www.maninnature.com/ASC/NWI1.html
Principles of the American Conservation Ethic
I. People are the most important resource.
All environmental policy should be based on the idea that people are the most important resource. The inherent value of each individual is greater than the inherent value of any other resource. Accordingly, the foremost measure of quality of our environment is human health, safety and well-being. A policy cannot be good for the environment if it is bad for people. The best judge of what is or is not desirable is the affected individual.
Human intellect and accumulated knowledge are the only means by which the environment can be willfully improved or modified. Environmental policies should inspire people to be good stewards. Within the framework of equity and liability individuals carry out deeds that create incremental benefits in the quality or quantity of a resource or improve some aspect of the environment. Cumulatively these deeds result in progress and provide direct and indirect environmental benefits to society.
II. Renewable natural resources are resilient and dynamic and respond positively to wise management.
Renewable natural resources - trees, plants, soil, air, water, fish and wildlife and collections thereof - wetlands, deserts, forests and prairies are the resources we are dependent upon for food, clothing, medicine, shelter and to meet innumerable other human needs. Human life depends upon their use and conservation. Such resources are continually regenerated through growth, reproduction or other naturally occurring processes which cleanse, cycle or otherwise create them anew. While all living organisms and activities produce byproducts, nature has a profound ability to carry, recycle, recover and cleanse. These characteristics make it possible for us to wisely use renewable resources now while ensuring they are conserved for future generations. As Teddy Roosevelt, a founding father of conservation, recognized: “A Nation treats its resources well if it turns them over to the next generation improved and not impaired in value.”
III. The most promising new opportunities for environmental improvements lie in extending the protection of private property and unleashing the creative powers of the free market.
Ownership inspires stewardship. Private property stewards have the incentive to enhance their resources and the incentive to protect them. Polluting another’s property is to trespass or to cause injury. Polluters, not those most vulnerable in the political process, should pay for damages done to others. Good stewardship is the wise use or conservation of nature’s bounty, based on our needs. With some exception, where property rights are absent, we must seek to extend them. If this proves elusive, we must seek to bring the forces of the market to bear to the greatest extent possible. There is a direct and positive relationship between modern market economies and a clean, healthy and safe environment. There is also a direct and positive relationship between the complexity of a situation and the need for freedom. Markets reward efficiency, which is environmentally good, while minimizing the harm done by unwise actions. In the market, successes are spread by example, and since costs are not subsidized but are borne privately, unwise actions are on a smaller scale and of a shorter duration. As a result, such actions are on a smaller scale and of a shorter duration. We must work to decouple conservation policies from regulation or government ownership. In aggregate, markets not mandates, most accurately reflect what people value and therefore choose for their environment.
IV. Our efforts to reduce, control and remediate pollution should achieve real environmental benefits.
The term pollution is applied to a vast array of substances and conditions that vary greatly in their effect on man. It is used to describe fatal threats to human health, as well as to describe physically harmless conditions that fall short of someone’s aesthetic ideal. Pollutants occur naturally or can be a by-product of technology. Their origin does not determine their degree of threat. Most carcinogens, for example, occur naturally but do not engender popular fear to the same degree that man-made carcinogens do. Microbiological pollutants, bacteria and viruses, though natural, are by far the most injurious form of pollution. Technology and its byproducts must be respected but not feared. Science is an invaluable tool for rationally weighing risks to human health or assessing and measuring other environmental impacts. Health and well-being are our primary environmental measures. Science also provides a means of considering the costs and benefits of actions designed to reduce, control and remediate pollution or other environmental impacts so that we may have a cleaner, healthier and safer environment.
V. The Learning Curve is Green.
As we accumulate additional knowledge we learn how to get more output from less input. The more scientific, technical and artistic knowledge we have, the more efficient we are in meeting our needs. As we gain knowledge, we are able to conserve by substituting information for other resources. We get more miles per gallon, more board-feet per acre of timber, a higher agricultural yield per cultivated acre, more GNP per unit of energy. Technological advancement confers environmental benefits. Progress made it possible for the American farmer of today to feed and clothe a population more than two and a half times the size of the one we had in 1910 and triple exports over the same time frame while lowering the total acreage in production from 325 million to 297 million acres. That is 28 million acres less, an area larger than the state of Louisiana that is now available for other uses such as wildlife habitat. American agriculture has demonstrated that as an unintended consequence of seeking efficiencies, there are environmental benefits. As Warren Brookes used to put it simply , “The learning curve is green.” This phenomenon has a tremendous positive effect on our environment and progress along the learning curve is best advanced by the relentless competition in the market to find the best or wisest use of a resource.
VI. Management of natural resources should be conducted on a site and situation specific basis.
Resource management should allow for variation of conditions from location to location and time to time. A site and situation specific approach takes advantage of the fact that those closest to a resource are best able to manage it. Such practices allow us to set priorities and break problems down into manageable units. Natural resource managers, on site and familiar with the situation, whether tending to the backyard garden or the back forty pasture, are best able to determine what to do, how to do it and when to do it. They are able to adapt management strategies to account for feedback and changes. A site and situation specific management scheme fits the particulars as no government mandate or standard can. Additionally, a site and situation specific approach is more consistent with policies carried out at lesser political levels. The closer the management of natural resources is to the affected parties, the more likely it is to reflect their needs and desires. The more centralized management is, the more likely it is to be arbitrary, ineffectual or even counterproductive. A site and situation specific approach avoids the institutional power and ideological concerns that dominate politicized central planning.
VII. Science should be employed as a tool to guide public policy.
Societal decisions rely upon science but ultimately are the product of ethics, beliefs, consensus and many other processes outside the domain of science. Understanding science for what it is and is not is central to developing intelligent environmental polices. Science is the product of the scientific method, the process of asking questions and finding answers in an objective manner. It is a powerful tool for understanding our environment and measuring the consequences of various courses of action. Through science we can assess risks, as well as weigh costs against benefits. While science cannot be substituted for public with scientific certainty. Laws are based upon normative values and beliefs and are a commitment to use force. Commitments to use the force of law should be made with great caution and demand a high degree of scientific certainty. To do otherwise is likely to result in environmental laws based upon scientific opinions rather than scientific facts. Such laws are likely to be wasteful, disruptive or even counterproductive, as scientific opinions change profoundly and often at a faster pace than public policy. The notion behind the Hippocratic oath - first do no harm - should govern the enactment of public policy.
VIII. Environmental policies which emanate from liberty are the most successful.
Our chosen environment is liberty, and liberty is the central organizing principle of America. To be consistent with our most cherished principle, our environmental policies must be consistent with liberty. Restricting liberty not only denies Americans their chosen environment, but also constrains environmental progress.
Liberty has powerful environmental benefits. Freedom unleashes forces most needed to make our environment cleaner, healthier and safer for the future. It fosters scientific inquiry, technological innovation, entrepreneurship, rapid information exchange, accuracy and flexibility. Free people work to improve the environment, and liberty is the energy behind environmental progress.
<>
The American Conservation Ethic is grounded in experience, science, wisdom and the enduring values of a free people. It affirms that people are the most important natural resource and that we must be good stewards of the world around us for this and future generations. It is founded upon a deep respect for the wonder, beauty and complexity of creation and is dedicated to the wise use of nature’s bounty. It reflects every American’s aspiration to make our environment cleaner, healthier and safer for our future, and it draws its strength from the most powerful force for improving our environment - free people.
The American Conservation Ethic works because, like the American people, it is practical. It applies the tried and true principles of individual rights and responsibilities to the conservation of our natural resources. Property rights create incentives that both reward good stewardship and empower individuals to protect their property from the harmful acts of others. The guarantee that we shall reap the fruits of our labor inspires the investment of time, money and effort necessary to expand upon centuries of accumulated arts and sciences. As we learn more, we are better able to be good stewards of natural resources.
The American Conservation Ethic relies upon science as a tool to guide public policy. Science is an invaluable tool for rationally weighing risks to human health and measuring other environmental impacts. Foremost among our measures of environmental quality are human health and well-being. Science also provides a means of assessing the costs and benefits of actions designed to reduce, control and remediate pollution or other environmental impacts. Central to the American Conservation Ethic is the understanding that scientific development, technological innovation and economic growth are essential for a cleaner, healthier and safer environment. As we increase our knowledge, we improve our productivity, efficiency and potential to innovate - and these achievements conserve energy, raw materials and other valuable resources. As we learn more about the natural world we discover how to get more than ever before from the resources we use. Progress provides the know-how, time and financial resources needed to fulfill our aspirations to improve the health, beauty and productivity of America.
The American Conservation Ethic is established on the fact that renewable natural resources are not fragile and static but resilient and dynamic. Such resources are continually regenerated through growth, reproduction or other naturally occurring processes which cleanse, cycle or otherwise create resources anew. Because these resources are continually renewed they can be used in a wise and responsible manner without the fear that they will be lost forever. Through progress we come to better understand renewable natural resources and the relationships among them. The knowledge gained improves our ability to wisely use and conserve these treasures for the benefit of current and future generations.
The American Conservation Ethic promotes workable means to reach our environmental goals, rather than depending on an inefficient centralized environmental bureaucracy. By relying on the first-hand knowledge and practical experience of local people and accounting for widely varying conditions, a site and situation specific approach provides practical solutions to the environmental challenges we face. The greater the degree to which solutions to environmental problems reflect the knowledge, needs and desires of those individuals most affected, the more successful they will be.
America has unsurpassed natural wealth. Our abundant mountains, plains, forests and coasts, our lakes, rivers and streams, our wildlife and fish are unique in all of the world. They have provided for and have been cherished by millions of Americans for generation after generation. Our people - living, growing and creating within our rich culture of liberty - are our greatest resource. Americans today clearly aspire to improve upon our tradition of wisely using and conserving the world around us for generations to come. The American Conservation Ethic is the way to fulfill these aspirations.
The American Conservation Ethic recognizes that free people work to improve the environment. It relies upon empowering individuals to use, enjoy and conserve our environment. It inspires and challenges individual Americans to improve their surroundings and lives, and thereby the world we share. Cumulatively, these are the most effective and dependable means to ensure a cleaner, healthier and safer environment, conserve America’s unique resources and protect that which we all treasure most - people and liberty.
Re my post #12 above:
The Heritage Foundation has a 1999 article on this subject, also.
This makes another good bookmark for future reference:
Effects of Environmental Policy on Private Property RightsEffects of Environmental Policy on Private Property Rights
National Hardwood Lumber Association
May 21, 1999
Cambridge, Ohio
http://www.heritage.org/About/Speeches/Effects-of-Environmental-Policy-on-Private-Property-Rights
Climatism – Belief in Anthropogenic Global Warming as a Religion http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/EcoReligion.htm
The Religion of Global Warming http://www.globalwarminghype.com/religion.html
Climate change belief given same legal status as religion http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6494213/Climate-change-belief-given-same-legal-status-as-religion.html
Global Warming Ruled a Religion by British Judge http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/04/global_warming_ruled_a_religio.html
Global Warming Afforded Same Legal Status as Religion in UK http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=16721
British Judge Rules Global Warming Belief is Like a Religion That Can be Discriminated Against http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/11/british-judge-rules-global-warming.html
Worker wins £100,000 after 'environmental discrimination' (they equal 'religious beliefs') http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/7610937/Worker-wins-100000-after-environmental-discrimination.html Link doesn’t work. This one does: http://sweetness-light.com/archive/warmer-gets-150k-for-discrimination
Judge rules activist's beliefs on climate change akin to religion http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/03/tim-nicholson-climate-change-belief
Political Corruption Equivalent to Religion, according to British Judge http://mensnewsdaily.com/2009/11/18/political-corruption-equivalent-to-religion-according-to-british-judge/
It's Getting Cold Out There http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0709/saunders071309.php3
Global warming is the new religion of First World urban elites http://tonyrogers.com/news/global_warming_new_religion.htm
Global warming is the new religion for idiots http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/2439/Global_warming
UN IPCC Lead Author Dissents on man-made warming: 'We're not scientifically there yet' http://www.climatedepot.com/a/2012/UN-IPCC-Lead-Author-Dissents-on-manmade-warming-Were-not-scientifically-there-yet
"Environmentalism Is the New Religion" - Ian Plimer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idYdVQ6nwfA
Losing Their Religion: 2009 officially declared year media lost their faith in global warming fears http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3310/Losing-Their-Religion-2009-officially-declared-year-the-media-lost-their-faith-in-manmade-global-warming-fears
Its Official: A New Religion Is Born. Environmetalism http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6494213/Climate-change-belief-given-same-legal-status-as-religion.html
United Nations Green Religion squeezing Jesus out of the House of God http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16809
Crucifix out, warming in (EU adopts Global Warming as new religion) http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/crucifix-out-warming-in/article1354734/
Are Socialism/Statism and Global Warming Religion Forms of Sado-Masochism? http://anarchydeluxe.com/2009/11/29/is-socialism-and-global-warming-religion-a-form-of-sadomasochism.aspx
"They Don't Care, but We Do" and "Global Warming: The Quasi Religion" http://www.barbarafromharlem.com/ Scroll down to Dec. 20, 2009 audio program
Czech President Klaus: Global Warming Not Science, but a 'New Religion' http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2009/12/18/czech-president-klaus-global-warming-science-new-religion/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fscitech+%2528FOXNews.com+-+SciTech%2529
Environmental Religion http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/11/environmental-religion/
Global Warming Is a Religion http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2010/01/13/global_warming_is_a_religion
Global Warming Is a Religion http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/williams011310.php3
Thinking Green--The New Religion http://www.albertmohler.com/2010/01/12/thinking-green-%E2%80%94-the-new-religion/
Environmental Religion http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/11/environmental-religion/
Is climate change the new faith? http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2010/feb/06/climate-change-simon-hoggarts-week
The Religion of Global Warming Takes Another Hit http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2009/10/religion-of-global-warming-takes.html
Obama’s Faith-Based Programs Pushing Global Warming, Climate Change, Green Issues http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/05/16/obamas-faith-based-programs-pushing-global-warming-climate-change-green-issues/
The Church of Climate Change: Here Comes The Green Shepherd http://www.bibleprophecyblog.com/2010/06/church-of-climate-change-here-comes.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:%20BibleProphecyToday%20(Bible%20Prophecy%20Today)#axzz0rimRxNb9
Green religion movement hopes oil spill wins converts http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/art_life/display_comments.htm?section=feature&StoryID=107179
New Media Craze -- 'Eco-Theology': Using Oil Spill + Religion to Promote Green Agenda http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2010/07/14/new-media-craze-eco-theology-using-oil-spill-religion-promote-green-agend
ELCA Joins Effort to Keep Clean Air Act Regulatory Authority Intact http://www.elca.org/Who-We-Are/Our-Three-Expressions/Churchwide-Organization/Communication-Services/News/Releases.aspx?a=4683
Letter to U.S. Senators from Marxist Churches of the Warming Globe in support of the Clean Air Act http://nccecojustice.org/climate/CAA%20Rockefeller%20letter.pdf
Christian Leaders Say Green Movement is False Religion http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-leaders-say-green-movement-is-false-religion-48236/
White House pushing churches to be 'green'? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=302981
Is Obama's GOP prayer partner Dem wolf in sheep's clothing? http://www.wnd.com/index.php/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=305845
WOW! That’s great. Thanx a lot.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.