My understanding of history says only James Buchanan could exceed Hussein as a worse Oval Office occupier. I am still undecided. Both are horrible executives.
Thing is, Buchanan had some experience—you would THINK he would’ve been at least able to do the job. Hussein, OTOH, is a “post turtle.”. So there is a lot to think about when picking which one sucks the most.
No fair, you’ve got to judge them on records, not preparation for office!
Buchanan is nowhere close to Zero or even Carter. Buchanan was indecisive and didn’t want to burden the new president, Lincoln, with decisions made just before the inauguration. Bad policy, bad approach, but he loved America. This is not the case with Zero. Carter was completely buffoonish and never worried about what his policies would do to Reagan.