Replies

You are advocating a state run religion, which is unconstitutional.

Are your replies always this stupid, or are you making a special effort today?

You must have slept through that portion of your civics class. Tell me where I expressly wanted the gov't to LEGISLATE the creation of a state run religion. . . . . .(crickets).

I have advocated the RIGHTS of FREE CITIZENS to use what ever standards THEY deem suitable for evaluating a candidate for office. THAT is still allowed under the CONSTITUTION - as long as thought-police like yourself are held at bay.

We are talking about what a candidate advocates before being elected, and not all Muslims advocate Sharia law in America.

The moslem answer would be "How can you call yourself a believer and “detach” yourself from Shariah (Allah’s Law)? Do you prefer the rule of men to the rule of the Divine? Do you not know the verse where your Lord has told that anyone who rules by other than His Law is a disbeliever?" (from a moslem) Further you must be ignorant about Dearborn MI eh?

But we know there is no right to an abortion in the constitution.

Excuse me - but that is not what the Supreme Courts say - whether we believe it or not - it bears the force of law in the land.

You compared evaluating a candidate’s views on abortion to their views on religion, and religion is clearly stated in the constitution, something you don’t value very much, bigot.

Ooooooooh the bigot card is played again - pretty much evidence that you haven't a clue. romney can practice his mormonism ALL HE WANTS - thats protected under the constitution. I can use his religious beliefs to evaluate his qualification for president ALL I WANT and that is protected by the SAME CONSTITUTION.

It seems our little friend here can only rely upon calling people bigots to stigmatize people that pose irrefutably good arguments as to why the constitution preserves our right to evalate candidates for office by any standard we deem correct. Perhaps he'll pull out that same constitution and really read it some day and leave the thought police to other leftists at DU.

You are advocating a state run religion, which is unconstitutional.

Are your replies always this stupid, or are you making a special effort today?

You must have slept through that portion of your civics class. Tell me where I expressly wanted the gov’t to LEGISLATE the creation of a state run religion. . . . . .(crickets).”

Remember moron when complained that as governor, Romney didn’t disavow his religion before being sworn in? You are saying that by remaining a Mormon he was governing as a Mormon, which is something that only a state run Christian advocate would say.

“The moslem answer would be “How can you call yourself a believer and “detach” yourself from Shariah (Allah’s Law)? Do you prefer the rule of men to the rule of the Divine? Do you not know the verse where your Lord has told that anyone who rules by other than His Law is a disbeliever?” (from a moslem) Further you must be ignorant about Dearborn MI eh? “

Not all Muslims believe in Sharia Law in America, and that discussion would be between Muslims. It’s not up to the public to decide if someone is a believer in Islam.

“Excuse me - but that is not what the Supreme Courts say - whether we believe it or not - it bears the force of law in the land. “

The president has no power to override Supreme Court decisions.

“It seems our little friend here can only rely upon calling people bigots to stigmatize people that pose irrefutably good arguments as to why the constitution preserves our right to evalate candidates for office by any standard we deem correct. Perhaps he’ll pull out that same constitution and really read it some day and leave the thought police to other leftists at DU.”

You are saying Romney can be a practicing Mormon, but you are still a bigot to say what you’re saying about his religion and how you don’t want him to be president, because of it. You don’t like the Constitution, since the Constitution allows anyone of any religion to be president.