Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txroadkill
Putting a fence on our side of the river is just giving up more to Mexico than we already are. But I will agree to fence the other side. We push into Mexico and set up a DMZ and tell them if they want it back, come and take it. It’s Mexico, what are they going to do?

Naturally, I like that idea better than fencing our side, but we both know that our government doesn't have the stones to take land away from Mexico by force.

If we're ever going to get a physical barrier on that border, we're going to have to build it on our side. Just look at how much political will it takes just to get THAT done.

1,945 posted on 10/18/2011 9:13:27 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1861 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/apr/pentagon-mexican-drug-cartels-threaten-entire-u-s

The Pentagon just finished a threat assessment. The next President will be sending troops into Mexico as part of the war on terror. When they do border security will be part of it, that is why we need to elect someone who understands the border, understands the military and is not afraid to us it.

1,985 posted on 10/18/2011 9:46:25 PM PDT by txroadkill (Antlers up! The Claw must be feared! Back2Back American League Champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1945 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson