The error in your logic is that a Romney win will satisfy the country that the Obama agenda has been stopped. Nothing could be further from the truth.
You see, the Obama agenda is actually more than him, he is a puppet for the radical democrat socialist movement.
President Romney will not roll back any of Obama’s “gains”.
All it would mean is that we hold the wheel for 4 or 8 years,,and then the dems continue their interrupted revolution.
But if Romney LOSES, the opposition stays hungry and angry. Maybe they turn their attention to reforming the GOP.
Im no longer a fan of the death of 1000 cuts that the GOP keeps giving me. The game is over,,I will no longer watch the GOP stab me in the back with Crist, Murkowski, Scozzafava, etc. I will no longer be patient as the party leadership openly attacks Sarah,. TEA, and Rand Paul,, and then smiles slyly and says, “well,, you might not like us, but the other guy is even worse”.
If the GOP establishment successfully pushes Romney to the front, they are openly saying that they DO NOT need my vote. That, or that they have no respect for me whatsoever.
Of all the vitriol I’ve gotten after expressing that I WANT ØBAMA DEFEATED—PERIOD!, you’ve actually posted a point that intriges me:
“But if Romney LOSES, the opposition stays hungry and angry. Maybe they turn their attention to reforming the GOP.”
This is worthy of debate.
I can’t help but note that the same thing was said in 2008. How’d that work out? Granted, we have a glimmer of hope with Tea Party influence, but how much success can we claim if Rahm-nee is the nominee?
The Republican party has a few young guns who seem to get it (Paul Ryan, Cantor, even Bachman), but overall they’re still inundated with Beltway Rove-o-Cons who only hurt the conservative image. If we can’t confront the MEDIA on its complicity in all America’s ills, the Republicans are a dead-party-walking as it is.