Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: behzinlea
Rush owns Perry because he urged him to run in the first place. I initially thought, based on Rush's input, that Perry was the man until he came out with his position on illegals being able to attend state colleges....then adding that conservatives that support this are heartless.

Rushbo is wrong on Perry and I wish he would man up to it!

And Santorum? Like everyone else, no other candidate had a plan and then he does his childlike 000 plan. That's not President material in my mind. The main thing that Santorum finds ridiculous about Cain is that, “It Should Have Been Me”.

113 posted on 10/12/2011 6:59:41 PM PDT by not2worry (IF YOUR ARE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: not2worry
Rush owns Perry because he urged him to run in the first place. I initially thought, based on Rush's input, that Perry was the man until he came out with his position on illegals being able to attend state colleges....then adding that conservatives that support this are heartless.

Rushbo is wrong on Perry and I wish he would man up to it!

In my opinion, Rush has one foot planted in the past, and one foot planted in the present. I believe that Perry appeals to his 20th century, old school political thinking. Perry has all the trappings of a 'big man' in the Republican party, and would have likely been a cinch to win the nomination 20 years ago.

What Rush is unsure of, is his footing in the politics of the 21st century. Although he's seen and commented upon the citizen rebellion known as the Tea Party, I don't believe he fully trusts The People to choose a non-establishment, rebel leader, for their president.

In my opinion, this is why he completely missed the historic importance of Sarah Palin. He said the other day on his show that he never thought she'd run for president (although any honest observer would admit that she clearly was doing so). He only commented on this because a caller took him to task for never mentioning the fact that Palin had just made it known that she wasn't running.

The fact that he didn't consider her announcement newsworthy enough to mention, tells me how disconnected he is from the current mindset of average Americans, who are looking for a revolutionary leader, and taking a pass on the usual crop of establishment types.

We'll see whether he finally finds his footing in the revolutionary politics of the present or not. In the end, he's just a commentator (albeit a very influential one).

294 posted on 10/13/2011 10:18:10 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson