Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C.’s Occupy Protest, Attracting Only the Usual Suspects (Milbank laments left's failure)
The Washington Post ^ | Tuesday, October 11, 2011 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 10/11/2011 9:30:49 PM PDT by kristinn

By the time they got to Woodstock, they were half a million strong. But by the time they assembled on Freedom Plaza on Tuesday morning to plan the day’s civil disobedience, they numbered only 53.

Attempting to emulate the Occupy Wall Street protests, Washington activists and some out-of-town guests set themselves the lofty goal of occupying the Hart Senate Office Building. “We are there to shut the place down!” organizer David Swanson told his small band of followers.

But how to do this with only a few dozen demonstrators? Well, Swanson said, they could push all the buttons on the elevators — the way naughty children sometimes do in apartment buildings. “There are people who are wanting to go into the elevators and fill them and not get out and push all the buttons,” he said. “If you like that, do it.”

SNIP

The elevator dispute says much about the new movement’s troubled ascent. The Occupy Wall Street protests tapped the left’s pent-up populism and anger at corporate excess. But here in Washington, progressive activists attempting to duplicate the phenomenon have so far had difficulty broadening their ranks beyond the usual suspects from antiwar demonstrations.

I don’t say this with satisfaction: A revived populist movement could be a crucial counterweight to the Tea Party, restoring some balance to a political system that has tilted heavily to the right. But while the Occupy movement in the capital has invigorated left-wing groups — Code Pink, Veterans for Peace, Common Dreams, Peace Action, DC Vote, Community Council for the Homeless and a score of other labor and progressive organizations are represented on Freedom Plaza — it has not ignited anything resembling a populist rebellion. To swell their ranks, protesters recruited the homeless to camp with them.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: codepink; danamilbank; occupydc

1 posted on 10/11/2011 9:30:54 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn

53? Apparently the courier with the daily checks got stuck in DC traffic.


2 posted on 10/11/2011 9:33:15 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The elevator stunt is very similar to the airport washroom gambit Alinsky describes in Rules for Radicals. The book says he threatened to have activists occupy all the stalls at O'Hare airport, unless their demands de jour were met. It was pure extortion -- Alinsky used the incident to illustrate rule #9: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself
3 posted on 10/11/2011 9:46:21 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This just shows how out of touch & elitist the author of the article is because the Tea Party WAS a populist movement & still is a rather populist movement. Furthermore the OWS crowd were motivated by the SAME concerns [ ie: the banker bailouts & other fiscal irresponsibility ] as the folks of the Tea Party are. This sounds like establishment attempts at trying to divide the populists movements for financial sanity into stark left & right camps hoping to deflate the effectiveness of both by trying to get them to fight amongst themselves instead of against the folks setting the bad fiscal policies. Now if more Tea Party & OWS folks got together to occupy the Federal Reserve THEN we would start to see some real progress on this front.


4 posted on 10/11/2011 9:54:59 PM PDT by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself “

Counter threat is sticking a 357 in the anarchists face and saying you will pull the trigger if they don’t leave now.

They will leave with tail between legs. Reagan did it to the Soviets.....it works.


5 posted on 10/11/2011 9:56:02 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (I am a Cainiac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

How many are there of the OWS. The propaganda is trying to paint a picture of a large movement. I am not seeing it. There is a handful here and a few there. Even “near” Wall Street the numbers are not impressive. What are we talking about. Maybe less than 10K total?


6 posted on 10/11/2011 10:06:17 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Milbank is actually getting very close to the right questions, questions he'll never ask because he does not dare to. It is this: given the ludicrously unimpressive turnout in nearly all of the announced venues, why is this "movement" being promoted and thoroughly misrepresented as some sort of tidal swell? Who is doing that promotion? What do they want?

These are questions any honest reporter would ask, because that's where the real story is and everybody knows it. One indication of just how corrupt the national press has become is that whoever actually does find answers will have their stories spiked by the envious and the tribal. Milbank knows the answer:

A revived populist movement could be a crucial counterweight to the Tea Party, restoring some balance to a political system that has tilted heavily to the right.

It's the sort of complaint Voltaire once made about God - if the movement did not exist, it would have been necessary to invent it. And it turns out that it doesn't, and it is necessary to invent it. The despair in Milbank's voice is that the invention is so transparently unsuccessful, and there is apprehension as well - what if the power of the media to influence political matters as they did in the 2008 election is waning? What if there's a price to taking sides?

He won't be asking those questions either, at least not in public. But he'll be thinking about them.

7 posted on 10/11/2011 10:07:50 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
The despair in Milbank's voice is that the invention is so transparently unsuccessful, and there is apprehension as well - what if the power of the media to influence political matters as they did in the 2008 election is waning? What if there's a price to taking sides?

Agreed. The media occupation is ending. They will pay for what they have done.
8 posted on 10/11/2011 10:18:58 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I don’t say this with satisfaction: A revived populist movement could be a crucial counterweight to the Tea Party...

The Tea Party is not a populist movement? Is Milbank really that stupid, or just blind?

9 posted on 10/12/2011 12:02:00 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Man, I can practically hear WaPo subscriptions being cancelled over this so-called reporting.


10 posted on 10/12/2011 12:03:03 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
A revived populist movement could be a crucial counterweight to the Tea Party, restoring some balance to a political system that has tilted heavily to the right.

Milbank is the ultimate caricature of the clueless leftist.

This is the same idiotic response that leftists had to the fall of the Soviet Union which left the US as the lone superpower. They absolutely must have a counterweight to anything or anybody who is good or decent or valuable, or else they get their panties all bunched up.

11 posted on 10/12/2011 12:14:19 AM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

53 protestors in DC? One would think you could get 53 people in any city that size to watch the lights change. This is an over-hyped farce.


12 posted on 10/12/2011 3:14:42 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Obviously the protesters should have started banging on drums. That seems to be the fashion for these lefties....bang on drums, and they will come. Sorta like a leftist Field Of Dreams or Street of Dreams. (smirk)


13 posted on 10/12/2011 7:08:49 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson