[tirednvirginia]

You mean he is going to hire a bunch of unproven people with no experience in the job he’s giving them should he get to be president?

If you don’t have experience in the job you are applying for you dont’ get the job, period.

You might get to be pizza delivery boy, but thats it.

[ozarkgirl]

You might get to be pizza delivery boy, but thats it.

LOL! You might try educating yourself a bit. That's too funny!

[mkjessup]

You mean he is going to hire a bunch of unproven people with no experience in the job he’s giving them should he get to be president?

No, not at all. Like other Cain-bashers, you too have missed the point. You made a lame and semi-clever remark that 'Cain wouldn't hire Cain' based on his 'lack of experience' and I informed you that you needed to better acquaint yourself with Cain's total resume' which has more executive experience than even Sarah Palin had.

If you don’t have experience in the job you are applying for you dont’ get the job, period.

Review Cain's executive experience in the business sector and you'll find someone of substance. Cain wasn't picked to be the economic advisor to the Dole-Kemp campaign in '96 because he was an economic dummy (and don't even TRY the 'smear by association' tactic there).

You might get to be pizza delivery boy, but thats it.

Based on your inability to research the experience of a presidential candidate, I suspect you wouldn't get the job of vetting anyone in ANY campaign.

But they might save a slice of pizza for you if you empty the wastebaskets at night.

[Oceander]

Are you kidding me? I still have Rick Perry at the top of my list, but Cain is right up there, at position 1.5. Herman Cain is eminently qualified; not only does he have substantial experience as a chief executive, he’s also been in government before - as deputy chair and chair of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

There are other reasons to ding Mr. Cain, but lack of relevant experience is definitely not one of them.