None. Not one.
We are not the ones racing around screaming innuendo and lies about “Perry wanting to be Romney’s VP” or “Perry playing the race card” or “Perry supported Romney in 2008” “Or Perry was pro abortion in his 2004 campaign”.
Make a fact base case for Perry or against Cain and that is good political debate. Screaming innuendo and lies about the opponent while refusing to make any sort of rational argument FOR Perry is not.
It’s hypocritical for the Perry camp to spend all their time complaining about how rough Perry been treated in light of how bare knuckled they own tactics have been.
Only in Perry's case, instead of "all hat, no cattle" it's "all crap, no toilet."
Cheers!