Skip to comments.
Bust the banksters, not the protesters
Capital Times ^
| 10-4-11
Posted on 10/04/2011 5:50:28 PM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: W. W. SMITH
Sorry. It’s sometimes used to excuse the bad guys with a big “R” by their name.
41
posted on
10/04/2011 8:08:54 PM PDT
by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: SJackson
All the commies are lining up for this one.
42
posted on
10/04/2011 8:11:20 PM PDT
by
Interesting Times
(WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: Yollopoliuhqui
You have a very strange version of reality goin’ on there. Feel free to join the smelly folks squatting on Wall Street.
43
posted on
10/04/2011 8:41:18 PM PDT
by
jdsteel
(I like the way the words "Palin for President" make progressives apoplectic.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Funny, the vast majority in the Tea Party were against bailouts for banks and TARP and all of that nonsense. But the progressive papers criticized us. And we don't block bridges and we don't smell bad and we don't bang on aboriginal drums in public, so we obviously aren't tuned into what matters. We wanted change, just not the right kind of change.
It's not that the protestors want the banks busted. It's that they also want government steroidally pumped up to even a even more immense level. THAT is what this is all about.
44
posted on
10/05/2011 3:22:16 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson